UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  x                             Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

The TJX Companies, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

xNo fee required.required
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

5)

Total fee paid:

 

     

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

3)

Filing Party:

 

     

4)

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


LOGO

LOGO

 

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

 

April 24, 2015April29, 2016

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

We cordially invite you to attend our 20152016 Annual Meeting on Thursday,Tuesday, June 11, 2015,7, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. (local time), to be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts. Please enter through the Northeast Entrance.Four Seasons Hotel Denver, 1111 14th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.

The proxy statement accompanying this letter describes the business we will consider at the meeting. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Please read the proxy statement and vote your shares. Instructions for Internet and telephone voting are attached to your proxy card. If you prefer, you can vote by mail by completing and signing your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed pre-paid return envelope.

We hope that you will be able to join us on June 11th.7th.

Sincerely,

 

LOGOLOGO

Sincerely,

LOGO

LOGO
Bernard CammarataCarol Meyrowitz

Executive Chairman of the Board

  

Ernie Herrman

Chief Executive Officer

and President

 

Printed on Recycled Paper


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   Page 

IntroductionINTRODUCTION

   1  

ProposalPROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

   23  

Corporate GovernanceCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   57  

Beneficial OwnershipBoard Independence

7

Board Nominees and Service at TJX

7

Board Committees and Meetings

9

Codes of Conduct and Ethics and Other Policies

13

Communications with Our Board

   14  

Executive CompensationTransactions with Related Persons

14

Audit Committee Report

15

Auditor Fees

   16  

Director BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

17

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

19

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

19

Summary Compensation Table

36

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2016

38

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2016 Year End

40

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested During Fiscal 2016

41

Pension Benefits

42

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

43

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

   45  

Proposal 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

48

Proposal 3 – Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

48

Equity Compensation Plan Information

49

Voting Requirements and Proxies

49

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations

50

Other Matters

50

Directions to the TJX Annual MeetingDIRECTOR COMPENSATION

   51

PROPOSAL 2 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AS TJX’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

53

PROPOSAL 3 - ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

53

PROPOSAL 4 -  STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF DIVERSITY AS A CEO PERFORMANCE MEASURE

54

PROPOSAL 5 -  STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A REVIEW AND SUMMARY REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES

56

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

58

VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROXIES

58

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

59

OTHER MATTERS

59

DIRECTIONS TO THE TJX ANNUAL MEETING

60  


The TJX Companies, Inc.

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 11, 20157, 2016

 

 

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. will be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusettsthe Four Seasons Hotel Denver, 1111 14th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 on Thursday,Tuesday, June 11, 2015,7, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. (local time) to vote on:

 

Election of directors

 

Ratification of appointment of ourPricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 20162017

 

Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation (the “say-on-pay vote”)“say-on-pay” vote)

Stockholder proposal for inclusion of diversity as a CEO performance measure

Stockholder proposal for a review and summary report on executive compensation policies

 

Any other business properly brought before the meeting

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 14, 201511, 2016 are entitled to notice of, and entitled to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must demonstrate that you were a TJX stockholder at the close of business on April 14, 201511, 2016 or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting from such a stockholder. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker, trustee or nominee, you will need to bring proof of your beneficial ownership as of April 14, 2015,11, 2016, such as a brokerage account statement showing your ownership on that date or similar evidence of ownership. All stockholders will need to check in upon arrival and receive attendee badges for security purposes. Please allow additional time for these procedures.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Ann McCauley

Secretary

Framingham, Massachusetts

April 24, 201529, 2016

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

PLEASE VOTE OVER THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL.


The TJX Companies, Inc.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 11, 20157, 2016

PROXY STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION

Why am I receiving this proxy statement?The Board of Directors of The TJX Companies, Inc., or TJX, is soliciting your proxy for the 20152016 Annual Meeting, to be held on June 11, 2015,7, 2016, to vote on the following items:

 

Election of directors (Proposal 1) – see page 23

Ratification of appointment of ourPricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 20162017 (Proposal 2) – see page 4853

  Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation (the “say-on-pay vote”) (Proposal 3) – see page 48,53, and also theExecutive Compensationsection, starting on page 1619

Stockholder proposal for inclusion of diversity as a CEO performance measure (Proposal 4) – see page 54

Stockholder proposal for a review and summary report on executive compensation policies (Proposal 5) – see page 56

Any other business properly brought before the meeting

Who can vote at the meeting?Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 14, 201511, 2016 are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each of the 682,260,150662,346,053 shares of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote.

How do I vote?There are multiple ways to vote your shares.

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card by mail or by using the procedures and instructions described on the proxy card and other enclosures to vote over the Internet or by telephone using the toll-free telephone number provided. You may also vote in person at the meeting.

 

If you are a “street name” holder (sometimes referred to as a “beneficial” holder), meaning you own through a third party likesuch as a bank or broker, please refer to the voting instruction card or other enclosures provided by that third party with this proxy statement to see how to provide voting instructionsdirections for your shares (which may include Internetshares. (Internet or telephone voting).voting may be permitted.)

 

If you hold shares in the TJX stock fund available through the TJX General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan, our U.S. 401(k) plan, or the TJX General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (P.R.), our Puerto Rico savings plan (collectively, “plan shares”), you may vote your plan shares by submitting voting directions by followingaccording to the instructions on the voting instruction cardenclosures provided with this proxy statement. In order to allow sufficient time for the plan shares to be voted by the plan trustee in accordance with your instructions,directions, your voting instructionsdirections must be received no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Sunday,Thursday, June 7, 2015.2, 2016. If you do not timely submit voting instructions,directions, your plan shares will not be voted.

Please note that the process for Internet and telephone voting is intended to authenticate your identity and permit you to confirm that your voting instructions are accurately reflected. Please seeVoting Requirements and Proxies on page 4958 for further information about voting.

Can I change or revoke my proxy?Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may change or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by voting later by Internet or telephone, returning


a later-dated proxy card by mail, or delivering a written revocation to the Secretary of TJX at our corporate offices at 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. If you are a “street name” holder, you should refer to the voting instruction card or contact your broker, bank or other holder of record for instructions on how to change or revoke your vote. If you hold plan shares, please refer to your voting instruction card or contact the plan trustee for instructions on how to change or revoke your vote.

What constitutes a quorum for the meeting?A majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting is required for a quorum for the meeting.

This proxy statement, the proxy card and the Annual Report to Stockholders for our fiscal year ended January 31, 201530, 2016 (fiscal 2015)2016) are being first mailed to stockholders on or about the date of the notice of meeting, April 24, 2015.29, 2016.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2015:7, 2016: THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL

REPORT AND FORM 10-K FOR FISCAL 20152016 ARE AVAILABLE AT

HTTP://WWW.ENVISIONREPORTS.COM/TJX


PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees and Their Qualifications

We seek nominees who have established strong professional reputations, sophistication and experience in the retail and consumer industries. We also seek nominees with experience in substantive areas that are important to our business such as international operations and growth; marketing and brand management; sales, buying and distribution; accounting, finance and capital structure; strategic planning and leadership of complex organizations; human resources and development practices; and strategy, growth and innovation. Our nominees hold or have held senior executive positions in large, complex organizations or in businesses related to substantive areas important to our business, and in these positions have gained experience in core management skills and substantive areas relevant to our business. Our nominees also have experience working with or serving on boards of directors and board committees of other public companies, and each of our nominees has an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends. All of our directors are financially literate, and, as described in our Audit Committee Report, two members of our Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts.In addition, each of our nominees havehas prior service on our Board, which has provided them with exposure to both our business and the industry in which we compete. We believe that all our nominees possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for board service and have highlighted noteworthy attributes for each director in the individual biographies below.

The individuals listed below have been nominated and are standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting. If elected, they will hold office until our 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. All of our nominees are current directors. Other than William H. Swanson,Ernie Herrman, who was elected by the Board in JanuaryOctober 2015, all of our nominees were elected to the Board by our stockholders. Bernard Cammarata, after more than 25 years on our Board and nearly 40 years of service with the Company, has decided to retire as Chairman of the Board, effective at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. After his retirement from the Board, Mr. Cammarata will remain with the Company in an advisory role as Founder and Executive Advisor.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees as director.nominees.

Zein Abdalla, 5657

Director since 2012

Mr. Abdalla was the President of PepsiCo, Inc., a leading global food, snack and beverage company, from September 2012 through his retirement in December 2014, prior to which he served as CEO of PepsiCo Europe, a division of PepsiCo, starting in November 2009 and as President, PepsiCo Europe Region starting in January 2006. Mr. Abdalla previously held a variety of senior positions at PepsiCo since he joined that company in 1995, including as General Manager of PepsiCo’s European Beverage Business, General Manager of Tropicana Europe and Franchise Vice President for Pakistan and the Gulf region. Mr. Abdalla is also a director of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Mr. Abdalla’s executive experience with a large global company has given him expertise in corporate management, including in emerging markets, operations, brand management, distribution and global strategy.

José B. Alvarez, 5253

Director since 2007

Mr. Alvarez has been a member of the faculty of the Harvard Business School since 2009. From August 2008 through December 2008, Mr. Alvarez was the Global Executive Vice President for Business Development for Ahold, a global supermarket retail company. From 2001 to August 2008, he held various executive positions with Stop & Shop/Giant-Landover, Ahold’s U.S. subsidiary, including President and Chief Executive Officer of Stop & Shop/Giant-Landover from 2006 to 2008 and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and Logistics from 2004 to 2006. Previously, he served in executive positions at Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. and began his career at the Jewel Food Stores subsidiary of American Stores Company in 1990. Mr. Alvarez is also a director of United Rentals, Inc.

and served on the board of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. from 2011 until 2013. Mr. Alvarez’s long career in retail has given him broad experience in large retail chain management, including store management, supply chain, logistics, distribution and strategy.

Alan M. Bennett, 6465

Director since 2007

Mr. Bennett served as the Chief Executive Officer of H&R Block, Inc., a tax services provider, from July 2010 to May 2011 and was previously Interim Chief Executive Officer from November 2007 through August 2008. He was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and a Member of the Office of the Chairman of Aetna Inc., a diversified healthcare benefits company, from 2001 to 2007, and previously held other senior financial management positions at Aetna after joining in 1995. Mr. Bennett held various senior management roles in finance and sales/marketing at Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation, formerly Armstrong Rubber Company, from 1981 to 1995 and began his career with Ernst & Ernst (now Ernst & Young LLP). Mr. Bennett is also a director of Halliburton Company and Fluor Corporation and was a director of H&R Block from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Bennett’s senior leadership roles in two significant financial businesses provide him with executive experience in managing very large businesses and change management as well as financial expertise including financial management, taxes, accounting, controls, finance and financial reporting.

David T. Ching, 6263

Director since 2007

Mr. Ching was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Safeway Inc., a food and drug retailer, from 1994 to January 2013 and has consulted through DTC Associates LLC, focusing on management consulting and technology services, since 2013. Previously, Mr. Ching was the General Manager for British American Consulting Group, a software and consulting firm focusing on the distribution and retail industry. He also worked for Lucky Stores Inc., a subsidiary of American Stores Company from 1979 to 1993, including serving as the Senior Vice President of Information Systems. Mr. Ching’s strong technological experience and related management positions in the retail industry provide Mr. Ching expertise including information systems, information security and controls, technology implementation and operation, reporting and distribution in the retail industry.

Ernie Herrman, 55

Director since October 2015

Mr. Herrman has been Chief Executive Officer of TJX since January 2016, a director since October 2015, and President since January 2011. He served as Senior Executive Vice President, Group President from August 2008 to January 2011, with responsibilities for The Marmaxx Group (Marmaxx), HomeGoods and TJX Canada, President of Marmaxx from 2005 to 2008 and Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operations Officer of Marmaxx from 2004 to 2005. From 1989 to 2004, he held various merchandising positions with TJX. As Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and through the many other positions Mr. Herrman has held with TJX, Mr. Herrman has a deep understanding of TJX and broad experience in all aspects of off-price retail, including merchandising, management, leadership development, strategy, international operations, marketing, real estate, buying and distribution.

Michael F. Hines, 5960

Director since 2007

Mr. Hines served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a sporting goods retailer, from 1995 to March 2007. From 1990 to 1995, he held management positions with Staples, Inc., an office products retailer, most recently as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Hines spent 12 years in public accounting, the last eight years with the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Hines is also a

director of GNC Holdings, Inc., where he serves as non-executive Chairman, and Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. Mr. Hines’ experience as a financial executive and certified public accountant provides him with expertise in the retail industry including accounting, controls, financial reporting, tax, finance, risk management and financial management.

Amy B. Lane, 6263

Director since 2005

Ms. Lane was a Managing Director and Group Leader of the Global Retailing Investment Banking Group at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., from 1997 until her retirement in 2002. Ms. Lane previously served as a Managing Director at Salomon Brothers, Inc., where she founded and led the retail industry investment banking unit. Ms. Lane is also a director of GNC Holdings, Inc., NextEra Energy, Inc. and a member of the board of trustees of Urban Edge Properties. Ms. Lane’s experience as the leader of two investment banking practices covering the global retailing industry has given her substantial experience with financial services, capital markets, finance and accounting, capital structure, acquisitions and divestitures in that industry as well as management, leadership and strategy.

Carol Meyrowitz, 6162

Director since 2006

Ms. Meyrowitz has been Executive Chairman of the Board since January 2016 and a director since September 2006. She served as Chairman of the Board from June 2015 to January 2016 and as Chief Executive Officer of TJX sincefrom January 2007 a director since September 2006to January 2016 and also served as President from October 2005 to January 2011. She served as2011, Senior Executive Vice President of TJX from 2004 until January 2005, Executive Vice President of TJX from 2001 to 2004 and President of Marmaxx from 2001 to January 2005. From January 2005 until October 2005, she was employed in an advisory role for TJX and consulted for Berkshire Partners LLC, a private equity firm. From

1983 to 2001, she held various senior management and merchandising positions with Marmaxx and with Chadwick’s of Boston and Hit or Miss, former divisions of TJX. Ms. Meyrowitz is also a director of Staples, Inc. and was a director of Amscan Holdings, Inc. from 2005 to 2012. As Chief Executive OfficerChairman of the Company,Board of TJX, and through the many other positions Ms. Meyrowitz has held with TJX, Ms. Meyrowitz has a deep understanding of TJX and broad experience in all aspects of off-price retail, including innovation, strategy, buying, distribution, marketing, real estate, finance and accounting, and international operations.

John F. O’Brien, 7273

Director since 1996

Mr. O’Brien is the retired Chief Executive Officer and President of Allmerica Financial Corporation (now The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.), an insurance and diversified financial services company, holding those positions from 1995 to 2002. Mr. O’Brien previously held executive positions at Fidelity Investments, an asset management firm, including Group Managing Director of FMR Corporation, Chairman of Institutional Services Company and Chairman of Brokerage Services, Inc. Mr. O’Brien serves as our Lead Director. Mr. O’Brien is also non-executiveNon-Executive Chairman and a director of Cabot Corporation, a director of LKQ Corporation and a director of a family of 93 registered mutual funds managed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment management advisory firm. Mr. O’Brien has substantial executive experience with two financial services businesses, giving him expertise including general management and oversight with respect to strategy, financial planning, insurance, operations, finance and capital structure.

Willow B. Shire, 6768

Director since 1995

Ms. Shire was an executive consultant with Orchard Consulting Group from 1994 untilto January 2015, specializing in leadership development and strategic problem solving. Previously, she was Chairperson for the

Computer Systems Public Policy Project within the National Academy of Science. She also held various positions at Digital Equipment Corporation, a computer hardware manufacturer, for 18 years, including Vice President and Officer, Health Industries Business Unit. Through her consulting experience and prior business experience, Ms. Shire brings expertise in leadership development, talent assessment, change management, human resources and development practices, cultural assessment and strategic problem solving.

William H. Swanson, 66

Director since February 2015

Mr. Swanson was the Chief Executive Officer of Raytheon Company, a technology and innovation leader specializing in defense, security and civil markets throughout the world, from July 2003 until March 2014 and served as Chairman of the board of Raytheon from January 2004 until his retirement in September 2014. Mr. Swanson had a career of more than 42 years with Raytheon, during which he held a wide range of leadership positions including serving as President of Raytheon from July 2002 to May 2004, Executive Vice President of Raytheon and President of its Electronic Systems division from January 2000 to July 2002, and Executive Vice President of Raytheon and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Raytheon Systems Company from January 1998 to January 2000. Mr. Swanson is also a director of NextEra Energy, Inc. Mr. Swanson’s qualifications include expertise in strategic planning, global business operations and extensive leadership experience from serving as chief executive of a Fortune 200 company.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Integrity has been a core tenet of TJX since our inception. We seek to perform with the highest standards of ethical conduct and in compliance with all laws and regulations that relate to our businesses. We have Corporate Governance Principles, a Global Code of Conduct for our Associates, a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives,written charters for each of our Board committees and a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The current versions of these documents and other items relating to our governance can be found on our corporate website, www.tjx.com, as described below inOnline Availability of Information.

Board Independence

Independence Determination. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that at least two-thirds of the members of our Board will be independent directors. The Board evaluates any relationships of each director with TJX and makes an affirmative determination whether or not each director is independent. To assist it in making its independence determination, the Board has adopted categorical independence standards which are available in our Corporate Governance Principles on our website, www.tjx.com.Principles. As part of the Board’s annual review of director independence, the Board considered the recommendation of our Corporate Governance Committee and reviewed any transactions and relationships between each non-management director or any member of his or her immediate family and TJX.TJX in accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles. The purpose of this review was to determine whether there were any such relationships or transactions and, if so, whether they were inconsistent with a determination that the director was independent.

As a result of this review, our Board unanimously determined that nine directors of our current11-member Board (82%) are independent: Zein Abdalla, José B. Alvarez, Alan M. Bennett, David T. Ching, Michael F. Hines, Amy B. Lane, John F. O’Brien, Willow B. Shire and William H. Swanson. The same determination was made previously with respect to Dawn Lepore, who served on our Board until June 2014. EachNone of these directors methad any relationship with TJX that implicated our categorical standards of independence. Bernard Cammarata,Carol Meyrowitz, as Executive Chairman, and Carol Meyrowitz,Ernie Herrman, as Chief Executive Officer, are employed byexecutive officers of TJX and are therefore not independent. Mr.Similarly, Bernard Cammarata, is retiringwho was an executive officer of TJX and served as Chairman of the Board until his retirement from the Board effective at thein June 2015, Annual Meeting and thereforewas not standing for reelection.independent.

Board Nominees and Service at TJX

Board Nominations. The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board individuals to be director nominees who, in the opinion of the Corporate Governance Committee, have high personal and professional integrity, have demonstrated ability perspective and judgment and will be effective in collectively serving the long-term best interests of our stockholders. As described below inBoard Expertise and Diversity, the Corporate Governance Committee considers a range of factors whenconsideringwhen considering individual candidates, including professional experience, personal integrity and potential contributions to the Board as a whole. In addition, the Corporate Governance Committee considers each director nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills in light of our business, including those that are identified in the biographical information contained above underNominees and Their Qualifications.

The Corporate Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating candidates, including candidates recommended by stockholders, includes actively seeking to identify qualified individuals by various means that may include reviewing lists of possible candidates, such as chief executive officers of public companies or leaders of finance or other industries; considering proposals from a range of sources, such as the Board of Directors, management, Associates, stockholders and industry contacts; and engaging a third-party search firm to expand our search and assist in compiling information about possible candidates. Mr. SwansonHerrman was recommendednominated to the Committee for consideration asbe a board nominee by our Chief Executive Officer, revieweddirector by our Corporate Governance Committee and then elected by the full Board effective the beginningin October 2015 as part of fiscal 2016.our succession planning.

The Corporate Governance Committee has a policy with respect to submission by stockholdersfor stockholder recommendations of candidates for director nominees, which is available on our website. Any stockholder may submit, in writing, one candidate for consideration for each stockholder meeting at which directors are to be electedelected. Stockholders wishing to recommend a candidate must submit the recommendation by noa date not later than the 120th120th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date that we released our proxy statement to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s Annual Meeting. Recommendations should be sent to the Secretary of TJX,

The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. AAs described in the policy, a recommendation must includeprovide specified information about, certifications from and consents and agreements of, the candidate, as described in the policy.candidate. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates for the position of director recommended by stockholders or others in the same manner as candidates from other sources. The Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview any candidates and may seek additional information about candidates from third-party sources.

Board Expertise and Diversity. As a global company with approximately 198,000216,000 Associates at our fiscal year end, we consider diversity among our Associates, customers and vendors to be part of who we are and core to our culture. At the Board level and throughout the organization we strive to promote the benefits of leveraging differences, inclusion and promoting a talented and diverse workforce. We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender and ethnicity/race and that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experience, educational background and expertise to provide sound and prudent guidance on our operations and interests. In evaluating the suitability of individual Board nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, but takes into account many factors, including general understanding of disciplines relevant to the success of a large and complex publicly traded company in today’s business environment,environment; understanding of our business and industry,industry; professional background and leadership experience,experience; experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies,companies; personal accomplishment,accomplishments; integrity; independence and geographic, gender, age, ethnic and racial diversity. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that the Committee believes can best perpetuatecontinue the success of our business and representsrepresent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its collective diversity of experience. All of our directors are financially literate, and, as described in our Audit Committee Report, two members of our Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts. We value the many kinds of diversity reflected in our Board and nominees.

Majority Voting. Our by-laws provide for the election of directors in an uncontested election by a majority of the shares properly cast at the meeting. Our Corporate Governance Principles require any incumbent nominee for director to provide an irrevocable contingent resignation to the Secretary of TJX at or priorleast 14 days in advance of the distribution date for proxy solicitation materials for the stockholder meeting at which such director is expected to be nominated to stand for election. This resignation would be effective only if (a) the director fails to receive the requisite majority vote in an uncontested election and (b) the Board accepts the resignation. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide procedures for the consideration of this kind of resignation by the Board. Within 90 days of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, the Board, with the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, will act upon such resignation. In making its decision, the Board will consider the best interests of TJX and its stockholders and will take what it deems to be appropriate action, which may include accepting or rejecting the resignation or taking further measures to address those concerns that were the basis for the underlying stockholder vote.

Board Service Policies. It is our policy that no director shall be nominated who has attained the age of 75 prior to or on the date of his or her election. Under our Corporate Governance Principles, directors who are CEOs of public companies should not serve on more than two boards of public companies besides their own and no director should serve on more than five boards of public companies.companies, including the TJX Board. Under our Audit Committee Charter, members of the Audit Committee should not serve on more than two audit committees of other companies. When a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenure as a director, our Corporate Governance Principles provide that the director is required to tender his or her resignation from the Board, and the Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board any action to be taken with respect to the resignation.

Board Committees and Meetings

Board Attendance. During fiscal 2015,2016, our Board met seven times. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was then a member.seventimes. The independent directors also met separately at regularly scheduled executive sessions. It is our policy, included in our Corporate Governance Principles, that all directors standing for reelection are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All directors who stood for reelection at the 20142015 Annual Meeting were in attendance.

The Board of Directors has five standing committees: Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance. All members of the Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation and Finance Committees are independent directors. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was then a member. While each committee has designated responsibilities, each committee may act on behalf of the entire Board. The committees regularly report on their activities to the entire Board. The table below provides information about membership and meetings of these committees during fiscal 2015:2016:

 

Name1

 Audit Corporate
Governance
 Executive Executive
Compensation
 Finance

Name

        Audit        Corporate
    Governance    
      Executive      Executive
    Compensation    
      Finance    

Zein Abdalla(1)

  +        +      +

José B. Alvarez

 +   +    +      +  

Alan M. Bennett

    * +        *  +

Bernard Cammarata(2)

   *         *    

David T. Ching

 + +      +  +      

Ernie Herrman

          

Michael F. Hines

 *    +  *        +

Amy B. Lane

 +  +  *  +    +    *

Dawn Lepore2

     +

Carol Meyrowitz(3)

            *    

John F. O’Brien(4)

   + +        +  +  

Willow B. Shire

  *  +      *    +  

Number of meetings during fiscal 2015

 12 4 0 6 4

William H. Swanson(5)

        +  

Number of meetings
during fiscal 2016

  11  5  -  9  4

 

*Committee Chairman
(1)Mr. Abdalla joined the Finance Committee in June 2015.
(2)Mr. Cammarata served as Chairman of the Board and as Chairman of the Executive Committee until his retirement from the Board in June 2015.
(3)Ms. Meyrowitz was elected Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee in June 2015.
(4)Mr. O’Brien served on the Executive Compensation Committee until June 2015.
(5)Mr. Swanson is not standing for election at the 2016 Annual Meeting.

* Committee Chair.

1. Mr. Swanson joined the Board and the Executive Compensation Committee as of the start of fiscal 2016.

2. Ms. Lepore served on the Board and the Finance Committee until June 2014.

Audit CommitteeCommittee.. (Mr. Hines,ChairChairman; Mr. Alvarez; Mr. Ching; Ms. Lane) The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm and oversight of the financial reporting process. Each member of the Audit Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards. The Audit Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by members of the committee annually. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

reviewing and discussing with management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial statements, including the accounting principles and procedures applied in their preparation and any changes in accounting policies;

 

monitoring our system of internal financial controls and accounting practices;

overseeing the internal and external audit process, including the scope and implementation of the annual audit;

 

overseeing our compliance and ethics programs;

 

selecting, retaining, approving the compensation of, overseeing and if necessary, replacing the independent registered public accounting firm, evaluating the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, including the lead audit partner;

 

establishing and maintaining procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints, including the confidential and anonymous submission of complaints by employees, regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters;

pre-approving all work by the independent registered public accounting firm; and

 

reviewing other matters as the Board deems appropriate.

In addition to assuring the regular rotation of the lead partner of the independent auditor, as required by law, the Audit Committee, including its Chair, has been involved in the selection of, and reviews and evaluates the performance of, the independent auditor, including the lead audit partner, and further considers whether there should be regular rotation of the audit function among firms.

Executive Compensation Committee.. (Mr. Bennett,ChairChairman; Mr. Alvarez; Mr. O’Brien; Ms. Shire; Mr. Swanson) The Executive Compensation Committee, or the ECC, is responsible for overseeing executive compensation and benefits. Each member of the ECC is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board and those required by NYSE listing standards. The ECC operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. Pursuant to its charter, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or to such other person that the ECC determines is appropriate and is permitted by applicable law, regulations and listing standards. The ECC’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

reviewing and approving the structure and philosophy of compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, and senior Associates;

 

approving the compensation and benefits, including awards of stock options, bonuses and other awards and incentives, of our executive officers and other Associates in those categories as are from time to time identified by the ECC;

 

determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including awards of stock options, bonuses and other awards and incentives, based on the evaluation by the Corporate Governance Committee of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and such other factors as the ECC deems relevant;

 

determining the performance goals and performance criteria under our incentive plans;

 

approving the terms of employment of our executive officers, including employment and other agreements with such officers;

 

reviewing and undertaking other matters that the Board or the ECC deems appropriate, such as the review of our succession plan for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; and

 

overseeing the administration of our incentive plans and other compensatory plans and funding arrangements.

The ECC also reviews our compensation policies and practices for our Associates to determine whether they give rise to risks which are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. SeeCompensation Program Risk Assessment,below.

Corporate Governance CommitteeCommittee.. (Ms. Shire,Chair;Chairman;Mr. Abdalla; Mr. Ching) The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending nominees to serve as members of our Board and for overseeing our corporate governance practices. Each member of the Corporate Governance Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with NYSE listing standards. The Corporate Governance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. The Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

recommending director nominees to the Board;

 

developing, recommending to the Board and reviewing corporate governance principles;

 

reviewing our policies with respect to significant issues of corporate social and public responsibility, including charitable and political contributions and political advocacy;activities, environmental and sustainability activities and charitable giving;

reviewing practices and policies with respect to directors, including retirement policies, the size of the Board and the meeting frequency of the Board, and reviewing the functions, duties and composition of the committees of the Board and compensation for Board and committee members;

 

recommending processes for the annual evaluations of the performance of the Board, the Chairman, the independent Lead Director and each committee and its chair;

 

establishing performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and annually evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against such objectives; and

 

overseeing the maintenance and presentation to the Board of management’s plans for succession to senior management positions.

Executive Committee. (Ms. Meyrowitz,. (Mr. Cammarata,ChairChairman; Ms. Lane; Mr. O’Brien) The Executive Committee meets at such times as it determines to be appropriate and has the authority to act for the Board on specified matters during the intervals between meetings of the Board.

Finance Committee. (Ms. Lane,ChairChairman; Mr. Abdalla; Mr. Bennett; Mr. Hines) The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board relating to our financial activities and condition. The Finance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. Specifically, theThe Finance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to our financing plans and strategies; financial condition; capital structure; tax strategies, liabilities and payments; dividends; stock repurchase programs and insurance programs;

 

approving our cash investment policies, foreign exchange risk management policies, commodity hedging policies, capital investment criteria and agreements for borrowing by us and our subsidiaries from banks and other financial institutions; and

 

reviewing investment policies as well as the performance and actuarial status of our pension and other retirement benefit plans.

Board Leadership Structure.. Our Board annually elects a director to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Carol Meyrowitz, Chief Executive Officer of TJX through fiscal 2016, became Chairman in June 2015. Starting at the beginning of fiscal 2017, Ernie Herrman became Chief Executive Officer and Ms. Meyrowitz continued as Chairman of the Board and an executive officer of TJX in the role of Executive Chairman. Consistent

with our Corporate Governance Principles, because our current Chairman Bernard Cammarata, is not independent, our independent directors have elected an independent Lead Director, John F. O’Brien. In his role as Lead Director, Mr. O’Brien, among other duties, Mr. O’Brien:duties:

 

meets at least quarterly with our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, and with other senior officers as necessary;

 

attends regular management business review meetings;

 

schedules meetings of the independent directors, presides at meetings of the Board at which the Executive Chairman is not present, including meetings of the independent directors;

 

serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Executive Chairman and Company management and approves Board meeting schedules and agendas;

 

attends the meetings of each Board committee; and

 

undertakes other responsibilities designated by the independent directors.

The Board believes that the separate roles of Mr. Cammarata,O’Brien, Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. O’Brien have beenHerrman are in the best interests of TJX and its stockholders. Mr. Cammarata has wide-ranging, in-depth knowledge of our business arising from his many years of service to TJX and, as a result, has provided effective leadership for the Board and support for Ms. Meyrowitz and other management. With Mr. Cammarata’s retirement, the Board plans to elect Ms. Meyrowitz to the additional position of Chairman at the Board meeting immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders. Given her close involvement with the operations of TJX and her deep knowledge of our Company, our industry and our Board, the Board believes that it will continue to receive effective leadership with Ms. Meyrowitz serving as its Chairman as well as CEO, and that combining the roles at this time

is in the best interests of the stockholders and TJX. Mr. O’Brien, will continue to serve as Lead Director, and provideprovides independence in TJX’s Board leadership, as provided in the Corporate Governance Principles, through his review and approval of Board meeting agendas, his participation in management business review meetings and his leadership of the independent directors. Ms. Meyrowitz, as Executive Chairman, has wide-ranging, in-depth knowledge of our business arising from her many years of service to TJX, and as a result has provided, and we believe will continue to provide, effective leadership to the Board and support for Mr. Herrman, as CEO, and for other members of management.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to TJX. The Board has oversight responsibility for the systems established to report and monitor the most significant risks applicable to TJX. The Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure and the committees’ regular reports at Board meetings. In general terms:

 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to TJX. The Board has oversight responsibility for the systems established to report and monitor the most significant risks applicable to TJX. The Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure and the committees’ regular reports at Board meetings. In general terms:

 

•      The Boardreviews strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and multi-year plans,plans; any major litigation and other matters that may present material risk to our operations, plans, prospects or reputation,reputation; acquisitions and divestitures and senior management succession planning and receives regular reports from our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer and Director of Enterprise Risk.

Officer.

 

The Audit Committee reviews risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including financial reporting, accounting, disclosure, internal controls over financial reporting, ethics and compliance programs, compliance with orders and data security and receives regular reports from our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer and Director of Enterprise Risk.

Officer.

 

The ECC reviews risks related to executive compensation and the design of compensation programs, plans and arrangements.

 

The Corporate Governance Committee reviews risks related to Board and CEO evaluations and management succession.

 

The Finance Committee reviews risks related to financing plans, investment policies, capital structure and liquidity, foreign currency exchange and commodity hedging policies, and investment performance, asset allocation strategies and funding of our pension and retirement benefit plans.

Compensation Program Risk Assessment. As part of our regular enterprise risk assessment process overseen by the Board and described above, we review the risks associated with our compensation plans and arrangements. In fiscal 2015,2016, the ECC reviewed TJX’s Associate compensation policies and practices and determined that they do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX. The ECC’s assessment considered (a) what risks could be created or encouraged by our executive and broad-based compensation plans and arrangements worldwide, (b) how those potential risks are monitored, mitigated and managed and (c) whether those potential risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX. The assessment was led by our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, and Director of Enterprise Risk, whose responsibilities include leadership of our enterprise risk management process, and included consultation with and input by, among others, executive officers, senior human resources and financial executives, the ECC’s independent compensation consultant and internal and external legal counsel. This process included:

a reviewThe assessment considered, among other things, factors intended to mitigate risk at TJX, including Board and committee oversight, use of ouran independent compensation programsconsultant, market checks, compensation mix, emphasis on objective performance-based pay, caps on payouts, company policies, and practices, including our historical compensation practices;

analysis of programs or program features and practices that could potentially encourage excessive or unreasonable risk-taking of a material nature;

a review of business risks that these program features could potentially encourage;

identification of factors that mitigate business risks, including, among others, a review of compensation design and elements of the compensation programs; the balance among these program elements; role of compensation consultants and other advisors; authority and discretion of the Board, the ECC and other Board committees in compensation;internal controls and procedures; programrisk management initiatives, and cultural elements and potential for individual or group influences; and

consideration of the balance of potential risks and rewards related to our compensation programs and itsthe role of those programs in implementation ofimplementing our corporate strategy.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics and Other Policies

Global Code of Conduct for Associates. We have a Global Code of Conduct for our Associates that requires our Associates to conduct our business with integrity. Our Global Code of Conduct covers professional conduct, including employment policies, ethical business dealings, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, intellectual property rights and the protection of confidential information, as well as adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. We have a Code of Conduct helpline to allow Associates to voice their concerns. We also have procedures for Associates to report complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters, available on our website, www.tjx.com.

Code of Ethics for TJX Executives and Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.. We have a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives governing our Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and other senior operating, financial and legal executives. The Code of Ethics for TJX Executives is designed to ensure integrity in our financial reports and public disclosures. We also have a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that promotesis designed to promote honest and ethical conduct, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and the avoidance of conflicts of interest for our Board members. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for TJX Executives or the Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as required, within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a posting on our website posting or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that a non-employee director is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times the annual retainer paid to the directorsdirector within five years of initial election to the Board. New board members are also expected to acquire initially at least $10,000 of our common stock outright upon joining the Board. As described further on page 2733 in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section, our executives are also subject to stock ownership guidelines. As of April 14, 2015,11, 2016, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with our ownership guidelines.

Board Annual Performance Reviews. We have a comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance of our Board and our directors. Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the entire Board, our Chairman, our independent Lead Director, each of our committees and its chair, and each of our individual directors. We review our process annually. In addition, each of our independent committees conducts an annual self-assessment.

Environmental Sustainability. As part of our continued commitment to corporate responsibility, TJX has long pursued initiatives that are good for the environment as well as our profitability. We believe in the

value of environmentally sound business practices throughout our operations, including energy and water conservation as well as recycling and waste reduction efforts. We understand that strong, sustainable business practices are important to our stakeholders, including stockholders, Associates, customers and the communities in which we work, and we work hard to evolve and improve our programs each year. Our corporate responsibility report, which highlights efforts we have made in these initiatives, is available on our website, www.tjx.com, in the Corporate Responsibility section.

 

Online Availability of Information

Our Corporate Governance Principles, Global Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance Committees are available on our website, www.tjx.com in the Corporate Responsibility: Attention to Governance section. Information appearing on www.tjx.com is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement.

Our Corporate Governance Principles, Global Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance Committees are available on our website, www.tjx.com, in the Corporate Responsibility: Responsible Business: Governance section. Information appearing on www.tjx.com is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement.

Communications with ourOur Board

Security holders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Board, the non-management directors or the independent directors as a group, specified individual directors or the Lead Director by writing to such individual or group, c/o Office of the Secretary, The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. The Secretary will forward such communications to the relevant group or individual at or prior to the next Board meeting. Stockholders and others can communicate complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters by writing to the Audit Committee, c/o Corporate Internal Audit Director, The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

Transactions with Related Persons

Under its charter, the Corporate Governance Committee’s charter, that Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction in which, in addition to TJX, is a participant and any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers 5% stockholders and(or their immediate family membersmembers) or any greater than 5% stockholders (or their immediate family members) is a participant and has a direct or indirect material interest, as provided under SEC rules. In the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for TJX entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Corporate Governance Committee may deem relevant. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the implementation of processes and procedures for screening potential transactions and providing information to the Corporate Governance Committee. During fiscal 2015,2016, Charles Bairos, brother-in-law of Ms. Meyrowitz, our CEO and a director during fiscal 2016, and Barbara House, sister-in-law of Mr. Sherr, an executive officer, were employed by TJX. They received compensation from us, including salary for fiscal 2016 and the beginning of fiscal 2017 and incentive compensation (cash and equity) earned for fiscal 2016, consistent with other Associates at their respective levels and responsibilities, totaling approximately $173,151 and $201,857, respectively, for fiscal 2015, including salary and incentive compensation (cash and equity).$207,600and $299,500, respectively. They each also participated in company benefit plans generally available to similarly situated Associates. Lisa Cammarata, daughter of Mr. Cammarata, our Chairman until June 2015, is an executive and ownerprincipal of one of the vendorsa vendor from which TJX acquires merchandise from time to time. During fiscal 2015, TJX purchased approximately $4.7 million$4.5million in merchandise from that vendor and during fiscal 2016 through the beginning of fiscal 2017. As described below in Beneficial Ownership, The Vanguard Group reported that it was the beneficial owner of more than 5% of TJX’s outstanding common stock. TJX expects to pay The Vanguard Group, Inc. and its affiliates approximately $375,000 for services primarily provided during the datesecond half of this proxy statement, approximately $0.8 million.fiscal 2016 and the first quarter of fiscal 2017 in connection with TJX’s retirement savings plans (including recordkeeping, trustee and related services). Our Corporate Governance Committee discussed and approved or ratified these transactions, consistent with our review process described above.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee operates in accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by the Committee. We are responsible for overseeing the quality and integrity of TJX’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee is composed solely of members who are independent, as defined by the NYSE and TJX’s Corporate Governance Principles. Further, the Board has determined that two of our members (Mr. Hines and Ms. Lane) are audit committee financial experts as defined by the rules of the SEC.

We met 1211 times during fiscal 2015,2016, including four meetingsfourmeetings held with TJX’s Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, Corporate Internal Audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PwC, TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm, prior to the public release of TJX’s quarterly and annual earnings announcements in order to discuss the financial information contained in the announcements. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of TJX’s financial statements, and PwC has the responsibility for the audit of those statements.

We took numerous actions to discharge our oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process. We reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of TJX as of and for fiscal 20152016 with management and PwC. We received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and the potential effects of any disclosed

relationships on PwC’s independence and discussed with PwC its independence. We discussed with management, the internal auditors and PwC, TJX’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. We reviewed with both PwC and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.

We reviewed and discussed with PwC communications required by the Standards of the PCAOB (United States), as described in PCAOB Auditing Standard 16, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of PwC’s examination of TJX’s financial statements. We also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations with and without management present.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and PwC, we recommended to the Board that TJX’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 20152016 for filing with the SEC. We also have selected PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016,2017, subject to ratification by TJX’s stockholders.

Audit Committee
Michael F. Hines,Chairman
José B. Alvarez
David T. Ching
Amy B. Lane

Michael F. Hines,Chair

José B. Alvarez

David T. Ching

Amy B. Lane

Auditor Fees

The aggregate fees that TJX paidwas billed for professional services rendered by PwC for fiscal 20152016 and fiscal 20142015 were:

 

In thousands2015 2014           2016   2015 

Audit

$6,588  $5,482            $7,810    $6,588  

Audit Related

 1,017   403             781     1,017  

Tax

 861   495             1,155     861  

All Other

 73   227             206     73  

Total

$8,539  $6,607            $9,952    $8,539  

 

Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of TJX’s consolidated financial statements including financial statement schedules and statutory and subsidiary audits, review of documents filed with the SEC, review of and opinions on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and in fiscal 2015 providing a comfort letter in connection with TJX’s issuance of notes.

 

Audit related fees were for services related to medical claims audits for fiscal 2014, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, and employee benefit plan audits for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015,medical claims audits and due diligence assistance for fiscal 2015.assistance.

 

Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, planning and advice, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax services for employee benefit plans, transfer pricing and requests for rulings and technical advice from tax authorities.

 

All other fees were for services during fiscal 2016 related to trainingour environmental sustainability program and foreign exchange and for TJX’s internal audit departmentservices during both fiscal 2016 and advisory services infiscal 2015 related to our on-going development of TJX’s conflict minerals program in compliance with Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.training for our internal audit department.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the Company’s retention of PwC. The Audit Committee of the Board pre-approves all audit services and all permitted non-audit services

by PwC, including engagement fees and terms. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chair,chairman, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Our policies prohibit TJX from engaging PwC to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information system design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, internal audit outsourcing, any management function, legal services or expert services not related to the audit, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services or human resource consulting. In addition, the Audit Committee evaluates whether TJX’s use of PwC for permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence. The Audit Committee concluded that PwC’s provision of non-audit services, which were approved in advance, was compatible with their independence.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

The following table shows, as of April 14, 2015,11, 2016, the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each director, director nominee and executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive officers as a group.group:

 

Name                     

Number of    Shares(1)
Shares
 

Zein Abdalla

 14,07516,452  

José B. Alvarez

 38,22539,717  

Alan M. Bennett

 41,52544,295  

  Bernard Cammarata(2)David T. Ching

  2,682,47439,747  

  David T. ChingScott Goldenberg

  41,144108,316  

  Scott GoldenbergErnie Herrman

  115,474559,300  

  Ernie HerrmanMichael F. Hines

  711,32552,558  

  Michael F. HinesAmy B. Lane

  49,76151,246  

  Amy B. LaneMichael MacMillan

  55,77840,000  

  Michael MacMillanCarol Meyrowitz

  64,259691,577  

  Carol MeyrowitzJohn F. O’Brien

  740,344113,040  

  John F. O’BrienRichard Sherr

  110,105115,000  

  Richard SherrWillow B. Shire

  145,00073,143  

  Willow B. ShireWilliam H. Swanson

  70,3746,784  

  William H. Swanson

4,464

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17(15 Persons)(3)

  5,124,7362,019,899  

The total number of shares beneficially owned by each individual and by the group above constitutes, in each case, less than 1% of the outstanding shares. ReflectsThe amounts above reflect sole voting and investment power except as indicatedpower.

Shares listed in footnotes below.the above table:

(1)Shares listed:

 

Include vested deferred shares (and estimated deferred shares for accumulated dividends) held by the following directors: Mr. Abdalla 4,951;6,169; Mr. Alvarez 36,262;37,858; Mr. Bennett 36,262;39,136; Mr. Ching 23,730;25,174; Mr. Hines 38,498;41,399; Ms. Lane 33,220;34,779; Mr. O’Brien 51,133;52,909; Ms. Shire 52,747;55,820; Mr. Swanson 3821,543 and all directors and executive officers as a group 277,185.294,787. Shares include 1,2631,159 estimated deferred shares (and estimated deferred shares for accumulated dividends) that are scheduled to vest within 60 days of April 14, 201511, 2016 held by each of Mr. Abdalla, Mr. Alvarez, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Ching, Mr. Hines, Ms. Lane, Mr. O’Brien, Ms. Shire; 382 held byShire and Mr. Swanson and 10,48610,431 held by all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Include shares of common stock that the following persons had the right to acquire on April 14, 201511, 2016 or within 60 days thereafter through the exercise of options: Mr. Goldenberg 16,802;20,923; Mr. Herrman 191,325; Ms. Lane 6,500; Mr. MacMillan 8,404;169,300; Ms. Meyrowitz 297,298;354,784; and all directors and executive officers as a group 565,141.562,463.

Include performance-based restricted shares that were subject to forfeiture restrictions as of April 14, 2015:11, 2016: Mr. Goldenberg 94,000;80,000; Mr. Herrman 520,000; Mr. MacMillan 40,000;390,000; Ms. Meyrowitz 250,000;140,371; Mr. Sherr 145,000;115,000; and all directors and executive officers as a group 1,216,000.765,371. Include 40,000 performance-based deferred shares scheduled to vest within 60 days of April 11, 2016 held by Mr. MacMillan. Shares listed do not include unvested performance-based deferred stock awards or restricted stock unit awards not scheduled to vest within 60 days of April 14, 2015.11, 2016.

(2)Includes 116,694 shares owned by a charitable foundation of which Mr. Cammarata is a trustee and 416,387 shares held in family trusts of which Mr. Cammarata is a trustee. Does not include 3,216 shares owned by Mr. Cammarata’s spouse as to which Mr. Cammarata disclaims beneficial ownership.

(3)Includes 16,000 shares owned jointly and over which an executive officer and spouse share voting and dispositive power.

The following table shows, as of April 14, 2015,11, 2016, each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% or more of our outstanding common stock:

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Number of SharesPercentage of Class Outstanding  

    Number of Shares    

  

  Percentage of Class  

Outstanding

FMR LLC(1)

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

58,061,8248.4%  44,333,251  6.6%

The Vanguard Group(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

40,793,8645.9%  41,772,762  6.2%

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

35,732,4755.2%  38,830,651  5.8%

 

 

(1)Amounts above based on ownership of FMR LLC at December 31, 20142015 as indicated in itsthe Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson with the SEC on February 13, 2015,12, 2016, which reflected that FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 4,887,7113,525,547 of the shares and FMR LLC and Ms. Johnson have sole dispositive power with respect to 58,061,824 of the44,333,251 shares.

 

(2)Amounts above based on ownership of The Vanguard Group at December 31, 20142015 as indicated in its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2015,2016, which reflected sole voting power with respect to 1,196,3001,255,692 of the shares, shared voting power with respect to 68,500 of the shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 39,660,05440,443,160 of the shares and shared dispositive power over 1,133,8101,329,602 of the shares.

 

(3)Amounts above based on ownership of BlackRock, Inc. and certain subsidiaries at December 31, 20142015 as indicated in its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2015,10, 2016, which reflected sole voting power with respect to 29,500,93831,613,389 of the shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 35,732,47538,830,651 shares.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), requires our directors and executive officers to file reports of holdings and transactions in our common stock with the SEC and the NYSE. To facilitate compliance, we have undertaken the responsibility to prepare and file these reports on behalf of our officers and directors. Based on our records and other information, all reports were timely filed, other than a delay in filing aone Form 4 to report transfersthe grant of shares for equivalent valueof restricted stock to Mr. Cammarata from three family trusts and to report the surrender of shares to TJX for tax withholding upon vesting of Ms. Meyrowitz’s performance-based restricted stock awardHerrman in March 2015.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section provides details of the compensation for fiscal 2015 for our fiscal 2015 named executive officers: Carol Meyrowitz, Chief Executive Officer; Ernie Herrman, President; Michael MacMillan, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President; Richard Sherr, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President; and Scott Goldenberg, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.

This section is organized into the following parts:

> Executive Summary: Our Performance and Compensation Program Highlights

> Overview of Process: How Compensation Decisions Are Made

> Compensation Program Elements

> Related Policies and Considerations

> Executive Summary: Our Performance and Compensation Program Highlights

Our Performance

TJX is the leading off-price apparel and home fashions retailer in the United States and worldwide.worldwide, with stores in nine countries, across three continents. Our management has led very strong performance at TJX through weak and strong economies. We believe our compensation program is critical to motivating our management to achieve our business goals. As our business continues to expand, we are working to deliver our value proposition in more markets, including in new geographies, which increases our operational complexity. We also believe that a key component to our success is maintaining the ability to develop new and existing talent towho can execute the fundamentals of our off-price business model and drive our long-term, global strategy.strategy across these varied markets. Our overall compensation philosophy is to create a balanced program to attract and retain top talent, motivate executives to achieve our business objectives, reward performance, emphasize variable, performance-based compensation through our incentive programs and maintain shareholder-friendly pay practices that help align the interestinterests of our Associates and shareholders.stockholders.

Fiscal 20152016 was a successful year for TJX, reflecting our management’s strong execution of our business model.

 

TJX Market Capitalization FY11 - FY15

LOGO

 

 

LOGO

Fiscal 20152016

 

 

$29.130.9 B

 

Net Sales

 

 

16%9.3%

 

Total Stockholder Return

 

 

$45.247.3 B

 

Market Cap

 

 

176219 / 3,3953,614

 

Net New Stores/Stores / Total Stores

 

 
 

We reached $29.1$30.9 billion in net sales in fiscal 2016, 6% more than lastthe previous year. We added a net of 176219 new stores induring fiscal 2015,2016, continuing our growth across our geographies.geographies, including three new countries. Our total stockholder return was 16%9% for fiscal 20152016 on top of 28%16% for the year before. Our market capitalization continued to grow, from $40.4 billion in fiscal 2014 to $45.2 billion at the end of fiscal 2015.2015 to $47.3 billion at the end of fiscal 2016.

Our three- and five-year compound annual growth raterates for shareholdertotal stockholder return of 26%18% and 30%26%, respectively, again exceeded the performance of the general market (S&P 500) and that of our compensation peer group discussed in this proxy statement. In the same periods, our compound adjusted earnings per share growth of 17% surpassedgrowth* was 10% and 14%, surpassing that of our peer group.

Total Stockholder Return Growth RatesAdjusted EPS Growth Rates*

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Our CEO’s compensation continued to be aligned with our strong performance.

 

LOGOLOGO

Our plan-based compensation for fiscal 20152016 reflects our strong performance.

 

Annual Cash Incentive Plan

119.62%

Payout for above target

corporate performance for FY15

Long Term Cash Incentive Plan

125.49%

Payout for above target

performance for FY13- FY15 cycle

Performance-Based Stock Awards

ü

Performance conditions

satisfied for periods ending in FY15

Annual Cash Incentive Plan Long Term Cash Incentive Plan 

Performance-Based

Stock Awards

168.92% 116.33% ü
Payout for above target corporate
performance for FY16
 Payout for above target
performance for FY14-FY16 cycle
 Performance conditions satisfied
for periods ending in FY16

 

*Notes on Charts:charts:

1. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of TJX and several of the peer group members excludeexcludes from diluted EPS from continuing operations computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) the positive and negative effects of items that affect comparability between periods. Several of the peer group members also report adjusted EPS, which are used in calculating the peer group averages. Peer group average includesaverages include only those companies with positive adjusted EPS in the most recent fiscal year or comparable period.period and excludes those companies that experienced corporate events that have resulted in restated financial statements from which we cannot reliably derive adjusted EPS for the three- and five-year periods. Our fiscal 2011 adjusted EPS of $1.75 does not includeexcludes the negative impact of $0.11 per share from operating losses and closing costs of A.J. Wright stores and $0.01 per share benefit for a reduction for Computer Intrusion related costs from GAAP EPS of $1.65. Our fiscal 2012 adjusted EPS of $1.99 excludes the negative impact of $0.06 per share from the A.J. Wright consolidationconsolidations from GAAP EPS of $1.93. Our fiscal 2013 adjusted EPS of $2.47 excludes an estimated $0.08 per share benefit from the 53rd 53rdweek from GAAP EPS of $2.55. Our fiscal 2014 adjusted EPS of $2.83 excludes an $0.11 per share tax benefit from GAAP EPS of $2.94. Our fiscal 2015 adjusted EPS of $3.16 excludes the impact of a second quarter debt extinguishment charge of $.01$0.01 per share fromon GAAP EPS of $3.15.

2. In the CEO Pay for Performance chart, Total Compensation for our CEO for each fiscal year, Ms. Meyrowitz, consists of base salary, annual and long-term cash incentives (MIP and LRPIP) with performance periods ending in that fiscal year, stock options valued at grant date and performance-based stock awards valued at grant date and allocated to the year of the related performance and service (seeReporting of Performance-Based Stock Awards, below).service. Reconciliations of adjusted EPS are included in the note above. Information reflected in this chart differs from, and is not a substitute for, the information presented in the Summary Compensation Table on page 3036 of this proxy statement.

3. In

We announced our CEO succession plan that became effective at the Fiscalbeginning of fiscal 2017.

On October 5, 2015, Compensation Elements chartour board approved our CEO succession plan that became effective at the beginning of fiscal 2017. The CEO transition resulted in the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.

The Board elected Ernie Herrman to the position of Chief Executive Officer, effective January 31, 2016. Mr. Herrman remains President of the Company and was elected a Director of the Company on page 18, Other NEO Average includes all named executive officers other thanOctober 5, 2015.

Carol Meyrowitz, the CEO. Target compensation for bothChief Executive Officer prior to the CEO transition through fiscal 2016, became Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective June 11, 2015 and other NEOs consistsExecutive Chairman of annual salary, target cash incentive awards with performance periods ending in fiscal 2015 (fiscal 2015 MIPthe Board, effective January 31, 2016. Ms. Meyrowitz remains an active executive and fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP), performance-based stock awards with performance periods ending in fiscal 2015 (valued at grant date fair value)an integral part of TJX’s executive management team, including as an advisor to Mr. Herrman on the Company’s long-term growth initiatives and fiscal 2015 option awards (valued at grant date fair value).

strategy.

TJX Compensation Program Highlights

Our compensation program emphasizesfor fiscal 2016 emphasized variable, performance-based compensation. These elements constituted a significant portion of target compensation for our named executive officers in fiscal 2015,2016, as shown in the pie charts below. Our fiscal 2016 named executive officers are the following:

Carol Meyrowitz, Chief Executive Officer;

Ernie Herrman, President;

Michael MacMillan, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President;

Richard Sherr, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President; and

Scott Goldenberg, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.

Elements of Fiscal 2015 Compensation Elements*2016 Target Compensation*

 

LOGOLOGO

*SeeNotes on Chartschart: on page 17

Other NEO Average includes all named executive officers other than the CEO. Fiscal 2016 target compensation consists of annual salary, target cash incentive awards granted during fiscal 2016 (fiscal 2016 MIP and fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP), and fiscal 2016 option awards (valued at grant date fair value), plus, for more information.our CEO, a performance-based stock award granted during fiscal 2015 with service and performance conditions related to fiscal 2016 (valued at grant date fair value), and, for our other NEOs, performance-based stock awards granted during fiscal 2016 with fiscal 2016-2018 performance periods (valued at grant date fair value). Target compensation does not include awards that are not considered to be part of annual target compensation, such as performance-based stock awards granted in connection with our CEO transition.

Key Principles

 

Our program is designed to be balanced, transparent and aligned with our core business goals.

 

Our program is heavily weighted to at-risk incentive compensation with payout based on performance.

 

We seek to maintain shareholder-friendly pay practices and tothat align the interest of our Associates and shareholders.stockholders.

Key Program Elements and Objectives

The following table below describes the key elements of our compensation program for our named executive officers. In addition to the more specific objectives summarized below,in the following table, all elements of our program are intended to help us attract and retain talented individuals.

 

Element

  

Objectives

  

Balance

Features
Salary  
Salary

•   Provide a base level of compensation that reflectsto reflect individual responsibilities.responsibilities, experience and value in the marketplace.

 

•   Recognize individual performance and achievement.

performance.

  Fixed  Shorter-
term
Shorter-term
  Cash

Annual Cash

Incentives (MIP)

  

•   Incentivize performance to reach or exceed our short-term, annual financial objectives primarily within each business division.on a divisional or company-wide basis.

   Encourage engagement, teamwork and teamworkcollaboration within division.divisions.

 

•   Reward achievement of financial goals for the current fiscal year, on a divisional or company-wide basis.

year.

  Variable  Shorter-
term
Shorter-term
  Cash

Long-Term Cash

Cash Incentives (LRPIP)

  

•   Incentivize performance to reach or exceed our longer term financial objectives across the Company.

   Foster teamwork and collaboration across divisions.

 

•   Reward company-wide achievement of multi-year financial goals (typically over three fiscal years).

 

•   Provide longer-term retention incentives.

  Variable  Longer-
term
Longer-term
  Cash

Equity Incentives

(Options and

Performance-BasedPerformance–

Based Stock Awards)

Awards)

  

•   Reward corporate performance reflected in stock performance.

 

•   Provide longer-term retention incentives.

Variable

•   Align interests with stockholders.

  Longer-
term
Variable
  

Longer-term

Equity

In addition, we provide health and welfare, deferred compensation and retirement benefits, as well as limited perquisites, to further support our competitive position and promote retention. We also provide relocation-related benefits, including tax equalization, to facilitate deployment of our Associates in global service.

Our executive compensation practices are designed to implement our key principles, as demonstrated by what we do and what we don’t do, as shown in the table below.

 

What We Do

What We Don’t Do

üPay for Performance

üOur short- and long-term cashperformance, directly tying incentive compensation is tied directly to achievement of objective Board-approved performance metrics based

ü      Setaward limits on core business goals.

maximum plan payouts

Award Limitsü       Useperformance-based vesting criteria for all stock awards to named executive officers

ü       Maintainstock ownership guidelines for executive officers and non-employee directors

ü       Maintain aclawback policy that applies to all executive officers

ü       Engage anindependent compensation consultant reporting directly to our Executive Compensation Committee (ECC)

ü       Perform anannual compensation risk assessment

ü       Conduct anannual say-on-pay vote of our stockholders

  üIncentive

O      Provide change of controlexcise tax gross-ups

O      Providesingle-trigger severance benefits following a change of control

O       Provide automaticsingle-trigger equity acceleration upon a change of control for awards granted in September 2015 or later

O       Providediscretionary increases to incentive plan payouts for our named executive officers can be decreased but not increased and are subject to limits on maximum payout.

Performance-Based AwardsüAll of our stock awards for named executive officers have performance-based vesting conditions; none are solely time-based.
Stock Ownership GuidelinesüWe have stock ownership guidelines of 5x base salary for our CEO, 3x base salary for other executive officers and 5x annual retainer for non-employee directors.
Clawback PolicyüWe have a policy for recovery of incentive compensation that applies to all executive officers.
Independent Compensation ConsultantüOur Executive Compensation Committee (ECC) directly engages an independent compensation consultant. The ECC’s consultant does not provide other services to management.
Annual Compensation Risk AssessmentüWe conduct a risk assessment of our compensation programs on an annual basis.
Annual Say-on-PayüOur Board elected to have our executive compensation program considered by shareholders annually through our say-on-pay vote (see Proposal 3). We have received more than 97% approval each year we have presented it to our shareholders.

 

O       AllowWhat We Don’t Do

Golden Parachute Tax

Gross-ups

×We do not provide change of control excise tax gross-ups.
Single-Trigger Severance following Change of Control×Severance benefits are payable to our named executive officers following a change of control only upon involuntary termination of employment or termination by the executive for “good reason.”
Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock×Our policies prohibit our executives from hedging or pledging TJX securities.
of Company stock

OPay Dividends dividends on Unearned Awards

×Dividends or dividend equivalent payments on performance-basedunearned stock awards to our executive officers are deferred until the underlying award vests.

RepricingO       Allow forrepricing or Exchangeexchange of Underwater Stock Options

×

Our Stock Incentive Plan (SIP) prohibits any amendment providing for the payment or provision of other consideration on termination or cancellation of any underwater stock optionoptions without stockholder approval.approval

Stockholder Response

Our stockholders have shown strong approval of our executive compensation program. Holders of more than 97%95% of the shares voting on the proposal have approved our advisory “say-on-pay” proposal each year since 2011 when we first asked stockholders to vote on an advisory say-on-pay proposal. The ECC believes that these results reflect our stockholders’ support for our approach to executive compensation, including the focus on incentive components linked to our performance, and has been mindful of this stockholder support when acting on compensation matters.

> Overview of Process: How Compensation Decisions Are Made

The ECC, an independent committee of our Board of Directors, is responsible for compensation design and for approving compensation for our executive officers. The ECC has used the same principle of compensation design for many years: establish a program of total compensation competitive with our peers, heavily weighted toward objective, performance-based incentives that focus on execution and reward achievement of our core business goals. In determining the overall level of executive compensation and establishing the design and mix of its specific elements, the ECC considers various quantitative and qualitative factors, such as company and divisional performance, individual executive performance and responsibilities, market data and peer practices, itsour business culture and core values, our experience with existing compensation programs, results of our advisory votes on executive compensation, the limitation on income tax deductions imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)), contractual obligations, recruitment, retention and succession planning, contractual obligations, promotions,and other organizational changes relocationssuch as promotions and transitional roles.relocations.

The ECC has an annual cycle of executive compensation actions and also acts to address any special actions in connection with management changes; employment agreements; retirement plans, deferred compensation and other benefits; and other ECC charter responsibilities. The ECC typically reviews and approves elements of compensation for our named executive officers on the annual schedule below:in the following table:

 

By the beginning of the fiscal year

•      Review and approve the peer group for new fiscal year

By the end of the first fiscal quarter

•      Review market data and competitive assessments

•      Establish award opportunities and goals for new MIP and LRPIP performance periods

 

•      Grant performance-based stock awards

 

•      Approve salary adjustments

In September

•      Grant stock options

After the fiscal year end

•      Certify performance results for completed performance cycles (forfor MIP, LRPIP and performance-based stock awards)awards

 

As noted above and discussed further below, the ECC consults with and reviews data from an independent compensation consultant to assess the overall competitiveness of our executives’ individual compensation and our compensation program overall and to determine the appropriate levels and the mix of individual compensation components.

Role of Executives

Our executive officers play a limited role in determining executive compensation. Our CEO provides an annual self-assessment to the Corporate Governance Committee and makes recommendations to the ECC regarding compensation of our other named executive officers. These recommendations are based in part on annual performance reviewsevaluations completed by the executive to whom each named executive officer directly reports. The ECC also receives a performance evaluation of our CEO including herthat includes our CEO’s achievement of performance objectives set by the Corporate Governance Committee which(which does not make compensation recommendations.recommendations). These evaluations take into account the named executive officer’s responsibilities, performance against objectives and support of our cultural values, including integrity, inclusion and respect. The ECC considers these performance reviewsevaluations and recommendations, among other factors, in establishing base salaries, cash incentive opportunities and equity grantscompensation for our executive officers. More generally, executive officers participate in our strategic planning process, discuss business and organizational strategies with the Board and recommend to the Board for its review and approval the annual and multi-year business plans for TJX and its divisions. These Board-approved plans are the basis for the short- and long-term incentive performance targets and the stock award performance criteria, which are approved by the ECC. The ECC regularly meets in executive session (without our management directors present) and invites executive officers to attend other portions of its meetings.

Compensation Consultants

The ECC has the authority, without Board or management approval, to retain and terminate compensation consultants and advisors and to determine their fees and terms of engagement. The ECC engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC, or PM&P, to serve as the independent compensation consultant to the ECC for fiscal 2015.2016. PM&P provided industry, peer and market data and advised the ECC on a variety of matters, including the CEO transition and related compensation matters, the design and competitive positioning of key compensation elements (base salary, annual bonus and long-term cash and equity incentives) for our named executive officers and other senior management, an analysis of short-term and long-term relationships between named executive officer pay and corporate performance relative to our peers, the establishment and evaluation of a compensation peer group, employment agreement terms, aggregate equity usage and program review, review of

peer group practices and updates on trends and regulatory developments. The ECC usesused this information to determine the design, overall level and appropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation, appropriate plan metrics and formulas, short-term and long-term incentive opportunities and cash and equity-based opportunities and to determine individual compensation components, including benefits and perquisites. PM&P did not perform any services for TJX other than work for the ECC and for the Corporate Governance Committee with respect to compensation of directors. PM&P reported directly to the ECC, which determined the scope of PM&P’s engagement and its fees.

The ECC regularly reviews the services provided to the ECC by outside consultants and believes that PM&P is independent in providing executive compensation consulting services. During fiscal 2015,2016, the ECC reviewed its existing relationship with PM&P, including potential conflicts of interest, and determined that PM&P’s work for the ECC did not raise any conflicts of interest and that PM&P continued to be an independent advisor to the ECC.

During fiscal 2015,2016, our management engaged The Hay Group as a compensation consultantWillis Towers Watson (formerly Towers Watson) to review our broader-based equity and cash incentive programs for eligible Associates,provide services to TJX including our named executive officers. The Hay Group conducted its analysis of the broader programs based on interviews with management and ECC members and peer and market data.retirement benefits consulting services. After the ECC consideredconsidering factors relevant to the independence of The Hay GroupWillis Towers Watson and determineddetermining that its work did not raise any conflictconflicts of interest, The Hay Group presented its findings to the ECC considered executive retirement-related information from Willis Towers Watson in making decisions regarding employment agreement terms and other executive compensation matters, as a supplement to the analysis and advice from PM&P.

Peer Group

As described above, the ECC uses a peer group to provide context for its compensation decision-making for our named executive officers. The ECC regularly assesses the composition of this peer group and considers revisions. Before the start ofDuring fiscal 2015, advised by PM&P, the ECC reviewed the composition of itsTJX’s peer group to be considered in establishing and evaluating fiscal 20152016 compensation for our named executive officers and determined that the following group of 19 large, publicly traded consumer-oriented companies wouldthat composed our peer group for fiscal 2015 continued to be appropriate:

 

 Fiscal 20152016 Peer Group 
  
Amazon.com, Inc.Kimberly-Clark CorporationRoss Stores, Inc.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.Kohl’s CorporationStaples, Inc.
Best Buy Co., Inc.L Brands, Inc.Starbucks Corporation
eBay, Inc.Lowe’s Companies, Inc.Target Corporation
The Gap, Inc.Macy’s, Inc.Walgreen Co.Boots Alliance, Inc.
Home Depot, Inc.Nike, Inc.YUM! Brands, Inc.
 

Nordstrom, Inc.

 

The ECC determined that the above group was an appropriate peer group for TJX for fiscal 20152016 based on criteria that included the following:

 

industry similarity, targeting retail companies and also considering consumer product companies that met complexity criteria;

revenues ranging from approximately one-third to three times our annual revenue (generally between approximately(approximately $9 billion and $80to $85 billion at the time of the analysis);

 

market capitalization ranging from approximately one-fourth to four times our market capitalization (generally between approximately $10(approximately $11 billion and $160to $175 billion at the time of the analysis);

 

comparability of business model, including levels of operational complexity such as geographic span, global operations, brand and/or product line diversity and multiple segments, e-commerce strategy business segments and other strategic and operational factors that contribute to business complexity; and

 

considerations of financial performance metrics, including operating and market performance.

The ECC considered all of these criteria and constructed the fiscal 2015 peer group to reflect a level of business complexity and performance more similar to TJX’s (which resulted in removing J.C. Penney and adding eBay, Inc. and Walgreens as compared to the fiscal 2014 peer group).

Although the ECC uses peer group data to provide context for its own determinations, it does not target compensation or any element of compensation for our named executive officers by reference to any specified level at the peer group.

> Compensation Program Elements

Compensation for our named executive officers includes base salary, incentive compensation (both cash and equity) and other benefits, each of which is described further below. Rather than applying a set formula, the ECC evaluates and balances the overall mix of compensation elements.

Base Salary

Each of our named executive officers receives a base salary in cash during the fiscal year that is intended to provide competitive, fixed compensation to attract and retain the executive at a level commensurate with his or her responsibilities, performance, experience and value in the marketplace. Base salaries are typically reviewed on an annual basis in connection with individual performance evaluations and may be reviewed in connection with new employment agreements, new positions, or other significant changes in responsibilities. Base salaries at the end of fiscal 20152016 are listed below.in the following table.

 

    Base Salaries at Fiscal 2015 Year End    

Carol Meyrowitz

$  1,575,000

Ernie Herrman

$  1,340,000

Michael MacMillan

$     970,000

Richard Sherr

$     820,000

Scott Goldenberg

$     675,000
Base Salaries at Fiscal 2016 Year End 

Carol Meyrowitz

  $1,575,000  

Ernie Herrman

  $1,390,000  

Michael MacMillan

  $1,010,000  

Richard Sherr

  $862,000  

Scott Goldenberg

  $750,000  

The ECC approved base salaries for fiscal 20152016 based on various factors, including assessment of individual performance and responsibilities, our fiscal 20142015 performance, contractual obligations and overall competitiveness. The ECC approved salary increases for each of our named executive officers, other than Ms. Meyrowitz, as part of our annual individual performance and salary review process described above.

The Board approved Ms. Meyrowitz’s fiscal 2016 base salary at the end of fiscal 2015 in connection with the approval of a new employment agreement and related compensation that became effective at the beginning of fiscal 2016.

Cash Incentives

A portion of each named executive officer’s compensation consists of cash incentives granted under our Management Incentive Plan (MIP) and Long Range Performance Incentive Plan (LRPIP). Awards under these plans require achievement, at levels specified by the ECC, of performance goals based on performance measures approved by our stockholders. Performance results for both MIP and LRPIP must be certified by the ECC, which has the authority to reduce, but not increase, the awards to our named executive officers. All MIP and LRPIP awards are subject to a maximum individual payout limit under plan terms (no more than $5.5125 million$5,788,125 for fiscal 20152016 MIP awards and no more than $5 million$5,250,000 for the fiscal 2013-20152014-2016 LRPIP cycle)cycle awards). Our cash incentives granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 20152016 were intended to qualify for an exemption from the deduction limitation rules of Section 162(m).

Annual Cash Incentives (MIP).    The short-term cash incentive awards made under our MIP are designed to motivate our named executive officers and other key Associates to achieve or exceed a performance target

pre-established by the ECC for the fiscal year. Each individual MIP award has a target award opportunity, expressed as a percentage of base salary earned during the fiscal year, tied to fiscal year goals of a combination

of our four major divisions (corporate goals) or for one or more of the divisions (divisional goals) or a combination of our four major divisions (corporate goals). The goalstarget opportunities and target opportunitiesgoals for our named executive officers for fiscal 20152016 are shown below.in the following table.

 

Fiscal 2015 MIP: Target Opportunities and Goals
 
Fiscal 2016 MIP: Target Opportunities and GoalsFiscal 2016 MIP: Target Opportunities and Goals

Name

  

% of Salary

 

$ Target

   Goals  % of Base Salary $ Target   

Goals

Carol Meyrowitz

  150% $    2,362,503    Corporate  150% $2,362,503    Corporate

Ernie Herrman

  100% $1,327,693    Corporate  100% $1,382,309    Corporate

Michael MacMillan

    55% $529,270    75% TJX Europe; 25% Corporate     55% $552,116    40% Corporate; 35% TJX Europe;* 25% TJX Canada

Richard Sherr

    55% $446,770    75% Marmaxx; 25% Corporate    55% $470,547    25% Corporate; 75% Marmaxx

Scott Goldenberg

    55% $364,905    Corporate    55% $406,155    Corporate

* The TJX Europe reporting segment has been renamed TJX International, which operates T.K. Maxx, HomeSense and tkmaxx.com in Europe and, starting in late 2015, Trade Secret in Australia.

For each fiscal year, the ECC pre-establishes the divisionalcorporate and corporatedivisional performance targets, the amounts payable at different levels of performance, including the maximum payout percentage, specified rates for converting foreign income (to remove the intra-year impact of changes in currency exchange rates) and automatic adjustments to reflect certain contingent (but objectively determinable) events that may affect performance.

For fiscal 2015,2016, the MIP performance targets and results (shown in the following table) were set at specified levels ofbased on adjusted pre-tax income for each division (or, for corporate awards, a specified level of consolidated pre-tax income for the Marmaxx, HomeGoods, TJX Europe and TJX Canada divisions), adjusted to exclude in each case capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense, and U.S. e-commerce and to reflect the pre-established exchange rates.goals. As annual pre-tax income is a profitability measure, it reflects other metrics, such as revenue and operating expenses, and is used across our company to plan, manage and evaluate our business. Thebusiness and is objective and understandable by participants. Each year, the ECC continued to viewevaluates the use of adjusted annual pre-tax income as the key performance indicator in our incentive compensation programs. For fiscal 2016, the ECC again determined that adjusted pre-tax income is an appropriate metric to motivate, focus and reward year-over-yearoperational performance across the company, particularly for our management. In setting these goals, the ECC believed that the various targets were challenging but reasonably achievable and that the payout formulas reflected an appropriate pay-for-performance sensitivity based on the maturity and expected growth of each division. The ECC also established a maximum payout percentage of 200%.

The fiscal 20152016 MIP performance levels and corresponding payout percentages are shown below,in the following table, including the thresholds (the level of performance at or below which no payout would be made) and maximums (the level at or above which the award payout would be the maximum under the award terms). After the end of the fiscal year, our performance is measured against the pre-established performance targets and MIP performance results are certified by the ECC. Participants are eligible to receive their target award if MIP performance equals the target performance. Theperformance, and payout formulas pre-established by the ECC determine payout percentages for performance above or below target.

 

  Fiscal 2016 MIP Performance Goals Fiscal 2016 MIP Performance Results
Fiscal 2015 MIP Performance Goals Fiscal 2015 MIP Performance Results

(in 000s)

 

                               (in 000s)                            

 

 (Adjusted Pre-Tax Income* in 000s) (Adjusted Pre-Tax Income* in 000s)
 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

     
 

Threshold

(Payout % = 0%)

 

Target

(Payout % = 100%)

 

Maximum

(Payout % = 200%)

 MIP Performance Payout % 

(Payout % = 0%)

 

(Payout % = 100%)

 

(Payout % = 200%)

 

MIP Performance

 Payout
   (% of Target)     (% of Target)   (% of Target)    (% of Target) (% of Target) (% of Target)

Corporate

 $ 3,397,173   87.5% $ 3,882,456   $ 4,270,682   110.0% $ 3,958,610    101.96% 119.62% $3,459,057 87.5% $3,953,180 $4,312,542 109.1% $4,200,851 106.27% 168.92%

Marmaxx

 $2,501,988 88.9% $2,814,719 $3,049,267 108.3% $2,934,368 104.25% 151.01%

TJX Europe

 £169,271   80.0% £211,586   £241,811   114.3% £202,930    95.90% 79.55% £   178,240 80.0% £   222,797 £   254,624 114.3% £   212,803   95.51%   77.57%

Marmaxx

 $ 2,434,048   88.9% $ 2,738,287   $ 2,966,466   108.3% $ 2,760,805    100.82% 109.87%

TJX Canada

 C$317,592 83.3% C$ 381,106 C$428,742 112.5% C$496,429 130.26% 200.00%

* Fiscal 2016 MIP performance was measured by adjusted pre-tax income goals for each division (or, for corporate awards, a consolidated adjusted pre-tax income goal for the Marmaxx, HomeGoods, TJX Europe and TJX Canada divisions) as shown above. Under the terms pre-established by the ECC, MIP performance goals and results were adjusted to exclude capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense, mark-to-market impact of inventory derivatives and certain new businesses (Austria, the Netherlands, U.S. e-commerce and Trade Secret) and to reflect the pre-established currency exchange rates.

The payout of each individual MIP award was determined by applying the applicable payout percentage to the individual’s target opportunity. Based onThe following table summarizes the performance resultsactual percentage payout relative to target and the actual MIP amounts earned for fiscal 2015, the named executive officers with corporate MIP goals earned awards equal to 119.62% of their target award opportunities. Mr. MacMillan earned an award equal to 89.57% of his target award opportunity (79.55% payout2016 performance for 75% of his award based on TJX Europe plus 119.62% payout for 25% of his award based on corporate results). Mr. Sherr earned an award equal to 112.30% of his target award opportunity (109.87% payout for 75% of his award based on Marmaxx plus 119.62% for 25% of his award based on corporate). The actual MIP award earned by each named executive officer, for fiscal 2015 iswhich are also included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan column of the Summary Compensation Table.

       Fiscal 2016 Actual MIP Awards    

Name

    Actual % Payout of Target Actual MIP Award 

Carol Meyrowitz

   168.92% $3,990,740  

Ernie Herrman

   168.92% $2,334,997  

Michael MacMillan

   144.72% $799,008  

Richard Sherr

   155.49% $731,642  

Scott Goldenberg

    168.92% $686,076  

Long-Term Cash Incentives (LRPIP).    The long-term cash incentive awards made under our LRPIP are based on cumulative divisional performance targets for a multi-year period. The program is designed to motivate our named executive officers and other key Associates to achieve or exceed long-term financial goals, as well as to foster teamwork and collaboration across the company and promote retention. As our LRPIP awards have overlapping multi-yearthree-year cycles, in each fiscal year we complete a cycle, continue our performance under an ongoing cycle and grant awards for a new cycle.

Completion of LRPIP Cycle.    LRPIP awards for the fiscal 2013-20152014-2016 cycle were granted in fiscal 2013,2014, with individual target opportunities and company-wide performance goals. Our named executive officers’ target award opportunities for this cycle were pre-established by the ECC as follows:

 

Fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP: Target Opportunities

Name

Target

Carol Meyrowitz

$  1,400,000

Ernie Herrman

$  1,100,000

Michael MacMillan

$     700,000

Richard Sherr

$     400,000

Scott Goldenberg

$     300,000
Fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP: Target Opportunities 

Name

  Target 

Carol Meyrowitz

  $1,475,000  

Ernie Herrman

  $1,100,000  

Michael MacMillan

  $700,000  

Richard Sherr

  $500,000  

Scott Goldenberg

  $400,000  

The ECC pre-established the LRPIP performance goals, including multi-year performance targets and weightings for each division designed to balance the focus on longer-term performance across all the divisions, amounts payable at different levels of performance, specified rates for converting foreign income (to remove the intra-cycle impact of foreign currency exchange rates) and automatic adjustments to reflect certain contingent (but objectively determinable) events that may affect performance.

For the fiscal 2013-2015 cycle,2014-2016 awards, the LRPIP performance target and results (shown in column A in the table below) waswere based on adjusted pre-tax income targetsgoals for our four major divisions for the three-year period,period. The ECC determined adjusted to exclude capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense and U.S. e-commerce and to reflect the pre-established exchange rates. Adjusted pre-tax income measured over a multi-year period was considered by the ECCthree years to be an appropriate metric to use as a basis for plan targets to motivate and reward long-term performance, asin that it isrepresents a core business metric used across our companyCompany to plan long-term growth, manage our divisions and evaluate ourmotivate long-term performance. The ECC also established divisional weightings (shown in column B in the table below), designedoperational performance and is objective and understandable to maintain focus at the smaller divisions, and a maximum LRPIP payout percentage of 150%, with each division contributing between 0% and 150% toward the final payout for performance ranging from 33% to 133% of the divisional performance target.participants. In setting these levels,goals, the ECC believed that the targets were challenging but reasonably achievable, that the payout formula reflected an appropriate pay-for-performance sensitivity for a long-term incentive program and that using the weighted combination of performance of our main divisions helps to promote our team-based approach to achieving our long-term goals.

How our LRPIP Works

Each division has a performance target (shown in column A below).

Each division’s performance (shown in column C below) is measured against its target.

LOGO

The pre-established payout formula determines the contribution of each division to the award payout (shown in column D below).

For each division, the formula is based on a 2.5 percentage point payout increase or decrease for each 1 percent that divisional performance results are achieved above or below the divisional target.*

LOGO

Each divisional contribution to the award payout (shown in column D below) is weighted according to thepre-established divisional weightings (shown in column B below) and added together to determine the overall LRPIP award payout percentage.

LOGO

The maximum LRPIP payout is capped at 200%.

* Each division contributes toward the final payout without a divisional threshold or maximum to reflect aggregate company results. Because of this aggregation of divisional performance, there is no single level of performance for threshold or maximum payouts. If we assume that each division performs at the same level against its target, the minimum (threshold) level for any payout would be 60% of each divisional performance target and the maximum payout level would be achieved if performance is 140% of each divisional performance target.

   Fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP
Performance Goals
 

Fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP

Performance Results

   (Adjusted Pre-Tax Income* in 000s)  (Adjusted Pre-Tax Income* in 000s)
   Cumulative 3-Year
Performance Target

(Payout %=100%)
 Divisional
Weightings
 Cumulative
3-Year LRPIP
Performance
   Unweighted
Contribution to
Award Payout %
 Weighted
Contribution to
Award

Payout %
   (A) (B) (C)   (D) (D x B)

Marmaxx

   $7,947,849 68.5%  $8,330,654    112.05% 76.75%

Home Goods

   $1,090,909 10.5%  $1,392,972    169.23% 17.77%

TJX Europe

   £   570,392 10.5%  £   580,624    104.48% 10.97%

TJX Canada

 C$1,311,450 10.5%  C$1,328,305    103.23% 10.84%
   

 

    

 

    100%  Total Payout 116.33%

*Fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP performance was measured by adjusted pre-tax income goals for our four major divisions for the three-year period as shown above. Under the terms pre-established by the ECC, LRPIP performance goals and results were adjusted to exclude capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense, mark-to-market impact of inventory derivatives and certain new businesses (U.S. e-commerce and Trade Secret) and to reflect the pre-established currency exchange rates.

After the end of fiscal 2015, divisional2016, LRPIP performance results for the three-yearfiscal 2014-2016 cycle (shown in column C in the table below) was measured against each divisional target and the LRPIP performance results were certified by the ECC. Participants are eligible to receive their target award if the LRPIP performance target at each division is metECC, and the payout formulas pre-established by the ECC determine payout percentages for divisional performance above or below target. The resulting payout percentages (shown in column D in the table below) are then weighted according to the pre-established divisional weightings (column B) and added together to determine the overall LRPIP award payout percentage.

   

Fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP

Performance Goals

 

      

Fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP

Performance Results

 

 
    

Cumulative 3-Year
Performance Target

(in 000s)

   Divisional
Weightings
      

Cumulative 3-Year
LRPIP Performance

(in 000s)

   Unweighted
Contribution to
Award Payout %
   Weighted Contribution 
to Award Payout %
 
    (A)   (B)      (C)   (D)   (D x B) 

Marmaxx

     $    6,947,870     68.5%           $    7,896,454     120.48 %     82.53 %  

HomeGoods

     $863,164     10.5%           $1,170,626     150.00 %     15.75 %  

TJX Europe

     £362,328     10.5%           £516,489     150.00 %     15.75 %  

TJX Canada

  C$1,173,756     10.5%        C$1,245,458     109.17 %     11.46 %  
     

 

 

        
                 
         100%               Total Payout     125.49%  

The payout of each LRPIP award iswas determined by applying the overall payout percentage to the individual’s target opportunity for that cycle. The actual LRPIP amounts earned by the named executive officers for the fiscal 2013-20152014-2016 LRPIP awards are set forth in the table below and are also included in the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP: Actual Amounts Earned 
Name  Payout 

Carol Meyrowitz

  $1,715,868  

Ernie Herrman

  $1,279,630  

Michael MacMillan

  $814,310  

Richard Sherr

  $581,650  

Scott Goldenberg

  $465,320  

New LRPIP Cycle.    During fiscal 2015,2016, the ECC established the following LRPIP dollar target award opportunities and performance goals for the fiscal 2015-20172016-2018 cycle for our named executive officers: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,575,000; Mr. Herrman, $1,100,000; Mr. MacMillan, $700,000; Mr. Sherr, $500,000; and

Mr. Goldenberg, $500,000. The ECC also established LRPIP performance targets for each division for the new cycle, divisional weightings, payout formulas, and a maximum LRPIP payout percentage of 200% for the fiscal 2015-20172016-2018 cycle, with each division contributing toward the final payout without a divisional threshold or maximum to reflect aggregate company results. Assuming that each division performs at the same level against its target performance, the minimum (threshold) level for any payout is 60% of the performance target and the maximum payout level is achieved if performance is at or above 140% of the performance target. Consistent with our past disclosure practice, we plan to provide additional detail about the performance goals for this cycle, which are based on business targets for fiscal 20152016 and future periods (fiscal 20162017 and fiscal 2017)2018), once the performance cycle is complete.

Equity Incentives

Equity Incentivesawards are made under the Stock Incentive Plan (SIP), generally in the form of stock options and performance-based stock awards. Stock options do not deliver value unless the value of our stock appreciates and then only to the extent of such appreciation, thus aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Performance-based stock awards include vesting conditions requiring achievement of pre-established performance criteria, linked to TJX’s financial performance. Both stock options and performance-based stock awards also have service-based vesting conditions that provide important retention incentives. Our equity incentives granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 2016 were intended to qualify for an exemption from the deduction limitation rules of Section 162(m).

In March 2015 and September 2015, the ECC awarded equity incentives to our named executive officers as shown in the following table. The ECC granted additional performance-based stock awards to Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman in January 2016 in connection with the CEO transition effective at the start of fiscal 2017, as further discussed below underPerformance-Based Stock Awards in Connection with CEO Transition.

Name  

Stock Option Awards

(grant date fair value)(1)

  

Performance-Based Stock Awards  

(grant date fair value)(1)

Carol Meyrowitz(2)

  $631,618  -

Ernie Herrman(3)

  $527,072  $9,106,500

Michael MacMillan

  $285,546  $2,802,000

Richard Sherr

  $329,420  $3,511,600

Scott Goldenberg

  $285,546  $2,101,500

 

(1)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of March 2015 performance-based stock awards and September 2015 option awards. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. Option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed on Note H to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016. The value of Mr. Sherr’s stock awards includes the value of accrued dividends on a fiscal 2017 MIP-based stock award from the date the ECC awarded the shares in March 2015 to the grant date for accounting purposes.

(2)Ms. Meyrowitz did not receive a performance-based stock award in March 2015. During fiscal 2015, the ECC granted Ms. Meyrowitz a performance-based stock award with MIP-based performance goals and service requirements for fiscal 2016 with a grant date fair value of $16,485,000, which was included in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2015 (the year of grant) in accordance with SEC rules. The performance-based stock award (transition award) granted to Ms. Meyrowitz in January 2016 in connection with the CEO transition is described further in the section entitledPerformance-Based Stock Awards in Connection with CEO Transition.

(3)The performance-based stock award (career shares) granted to Mr. Herrman in January 2016 in connection with the CEO transition is described further in the section entitledPerformance-Based Stock Awards in Connection with CEO Transition.

Equity awards are made under the SIP, generally in the form of stock options and performance-based stock awards. Stock options do not deliver value unless the value of our stock appreciates and then only to the extent of such appreciation, thus linking the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Performance-based stock awards include vesting conditions requiring achievement of pre-established performance criteria, linked to TJX’s financial performance. Both stock options and performance-based stock awards also have service-based vesting conditions that provide important retention incentives. Our equity incentives granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 2015 were intended to qualify for an exemption from the deduction limitation rules of Section 162(m).

Stock Option Grants.    The ECC determined the number of stock options granted to our named executive officers in September 20142015 by setting a fixed dollar value for each named executive officer and dividing this value by the stock price on the grant date. The fixed dollar value for named executive officers is a function of internal compensation levels and historical practices and is reviewed by the ECC for overall market competitiveness. All option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the NYSE on the date of grant.

 

Performance Based Stock Awards.

Vesting of Performance-Based Stock Awards. Each named executive officer held performance-based stock awards with performance-based vesting criteria that were satisfied based on fiscal 2015 MIP performance or fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP performance, as follows:

 

Equity Grant Practices

 

•      All of our equity awards are made under our shareholder-approved Stock Incentive Plan (SIP).SIP.

 

•      The exercise price of each stock option grant is the closing stock price on the NYSE on the grant date.

 

•      The ECC does not have any programs, plans or practices of timing these equity grants in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

 

•      Virtually all of our equity awards are granted at regularly scheduled ECC meetings held at approximately the same times each year and scheduled in advance.

 

The MIP-based award held by Ms. Meyrowitz fully vested upon ECC certification of achievement of a fiscal 2015 payout of 119.62% of the corporate MIP target awards (as described underAnnual Cash

Incentives (MIP), above). The performance condition for full vesting was achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the corporate MIP target payout, which required us to achieve 96% of the targeted performance reflected in the fiscal 2015 plan.

LRPIP-based awards held by our other named executive officers contained performance-based vesting conditions that were satisfied upon ECC certification of achievement of a payout of 125.49% of the fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP target awards (as described underCompletion of LRPIP Cycle, above). The performance condition for full vesting of these awards was achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP target payout, which, reflecting the weighting of the divisions and assuming that each division performed at the same level against its target performance, required us to achieve 78% of the targeted cumulative performance reflected in that plan. These awards remained subject to service-based vesting conditions after fiscal 2015 year end, as described in footnote 3 to the Outstanding Equity Awards table.

Grants of New Performance-Based Stock AwardsAwards.. The ECC awarded new performance-based stock awards in fiscal 20152016 to our named executive officers based on factors including the executive’s responsibilities, the potential value of each grant and the overall competitiveness and mix of executive compensation. Each of our named executive officers, other than Ms. Meyrowitz’s performance-basedMeyrowitz, received fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP-based stock award was granted atawards in March 2015. Based on his performance and responsibilities for our largest division, Mr. Sherr also receivedMIP-based stock awards intended to bridge the interim periods until the end of the fiscal 2015 in connection with her entering into a new employment agreement as described below and includes vesting conditions requiring satisfaction of MIP-based performance goals and service requirements for fiscal 2016. The other named executive officers received fiscal 2015-2017 LRPIP-based stock awards.

These awards are reflected in the compensation tables below.2016-2018 LRPIP cycle. Full vesting of thesethe LRPIP-based awards is subject to satisfaction of performance-basedthree-year performance vesting conditions requiring achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the target corporate MIP or LRPIP payout for the performance period,fiscal2016-2018 cycle, which will require us to achieve 96% of targeted performance under MIP (for the fiscal 2016 MIP-based award) or 87% of targetedthe three-year cumulative target performance, under LRPIP (for fiscal 2015-2017 LRPIP-based awards), taking into account divisional weightings and assuming that each division performs at the same level against its target performance. Performance resulting in a payout below this target level reduces the number of shares that would otherwise vest, pro rata, with no shares vesting if no payout is achieved. Vesting of these awards is also subject to satisfaction of service requirements specified in the awards. The ECC believes that, in addition to linking individual compensation to our target performance, these awards perform an important retention function. Ms. Meyrowitz received a fiscal 2016 MIP-based stock award during fiscal 2015, as described in our fiscal 2015 proxy statement. Under her new employment agreement that became effective at the beginning of fiscal 2017, Ms. Meyrowitz’s future performance-based stock awards will have a three-year performance vesting period.

Performance-Based Stock Awards in Connection with CEO Transition.    In January 2016, the ECC granted awards of performance-based restricted stock to Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman in connection with their transition to new roles and their new employment agreements that became effective at the start of fiscal 2017.

 

Performance-Based Stock Awards in Connection with CEO Transition
NameGrant date fair value(1)
Carol Meyrowitz$10,000,030

Transition award: 70,186 shares scheduled to vest based on continued employment with the Company through fiscal 2017, and 70,185 shares scheduled to vest based on continued employment with the Company through fiscal 2018; full award is subject to fiscal 2017 MIP-based performance conditions

Ernie Herrman

  $5,000,051Career shares: 70,186 restricted stock units scheduled to vest in full at the end of fiscal 2026 with pro-rated annual vesting beginning at the end of fiscal 2020, subject to continued employment with the Company; full award is subject to fiscal 2017 MIP-based performance conditions

Reporting

(1)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of performance-based stock awards granted in January 2016 in connection with our CEO transition. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed on Note H to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016.

The ECC granted the transition award of performance-based restricted stock to Ms. Meyrowitz as part of her transition to three-year performance-based stock awards starting in fiscal 2017. Under her new employment agreement, Ms. Meyrowitz is entitled, subject to her continued employment with us, to future annual performance-based stock awards with a grant date value of $5 million that will be subject to satisfaction of LRPIP-based performance criteria with a three-year performance vesting period. The ECC believes that using the multi-year performance period under LRPIP as the performance condition for future stock awards will help align her long-term interests with those of our stockholders, promote retention and be more consistent with performance conditions used in stock awards for our other executives. The first of Ms. Meyrowitz’s three-year awards, with performance conditions based on the fiscal 2017-2019 LRPIP cycle, was granted after the close of fiscal 2016.

This performance-based stock award for Mr. Herrman is structured as an award of “career shares” in that the units are scheduled to vest in full at the end of fiscal 2026, with prorated annual vesting beginning at the end of fiscal 2020, subject to his continued employment with us. In connection with its review of Mr. Herrman’s new employment agreement terms and benefits, the ECC made the career shares award to Mr. Herrman in recognition of his promotion to CEO and in consideration of the importance of promoting his retention and aligning his long-term interests with those of our stockholders.

These stock awards for Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman have performance-based vesting criteria. Full vesting of these awards is subject to satisfaction of performance-based conditions requiring achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the target corporate MIP for the performance period, which will require us to achieve 96% of targeted performance under MIP for fiscal 2017. Performance resulting in a payout below this target level reduces the number of shares that would otherwise vest, pro rata, with no shares vesting if no payout is achieved.

Vesting of Performance-Based Stock Awards

Awards.Our named executive officers held performance-based stock awards includewith performance-based vesting criteria that were satisfied based on fiscal 2016 MIP performance (in the case of Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Sherr) or fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP performance (in the case of each named executive officer other than Ms. Meyrowitz), as follows:

Satisfaction of Performance Vesting Criteria
Performance Condition for Full VestingPerformance Results

MIP-based

Stock Awards

Achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the corporate MIP target payout for fiscal 2016, which required us to achieve 96% of the targeted performance for fiscal 2016 MIPFiscal 2016 corporate MIP payout of 168.92%
LRPIP-based Stock AwardsAchievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP target payout, which required us to achieve 87% of the targeted cumulative performance for the fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP cycle (reflecting the weighting of the divisions and assuming that each division performed at the same level against its target)Fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP payout of 116.33%

The service-based vesting conditions requiring satisfactionfor Ms. Meyrowitz’s award were also satisfied at the end of performance and service requirements pre-establishedfiscal 2016, but the awards held by the ECC. Under SEC rules, these awards are reported in the proxy statement in the year of grant, as determined for accounting purposes under ASC Topic 718. As a result, the equity compensation of our other named executive officers shownremained subject to service-based vesting conditions after fiscal 2016 year end, as described in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table as granted for a particular year sometimes reflects awards intended by the ECC to compensate the executives for service and performance in other years. See footnote 3 to the Outstanding Equity Awards table for further detail on the vesting terms for stock awards held by our named executive officers.table.

Other Compensation Components

Retirement Benefits.Benefits.    All of our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan and also participate in a broad-based pension plan for U.S. Associates under which benefits are accrued based on compensation and service. We also maintain a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). Ms. Meyrowitz is a vested participant in our primary SERP benefit program, a nonqualified pension benefit based on final average earnings. We have not offered primary SERP benefits to new participants for many years. Mr. Herrman,

Mr. MacMillan, Mr. Sherr and Mr. Goldenberg participate in our alternative SERP benefit program, which

is intended to restore pension benefits that would otherwise not be available due to Internal Revenue Code restrictions. These programs are discussed underPension Benefits, below..

Deferred Compensation.Compensation.    Our named executive officers can defer compensation under our Executive Savings Plan (ESP), an elective deferred compensation plan, intended to help us compete for and retain talent by providing participants with additional opportunities for personal financial planning and by rewarding and encouraging retention. Participants in the ESP, other than those eligible for our primary SERP benefit, receive an employer match based in part on our performance under our MIP. Mr. Herrman, Mr. MacMillan, Mr. Sherr and Mr. Goldenberg received this match for fiscal 2015.2016. Under his new employment agreement, Mr. Herrman is also eligible for supplemental Company credits of $1 million for each of fiscal 2017, fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 if applicable performance goals are met for the fiscal year. Amounts deferred under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments selected by the participant. Ms. Meyrowitz has amounts previously deferred under our General Deferred Compensation Plan (GDCP), now closed to new deferrals, which earn notional interest at an annually adjusted rate based on U.S. Treasury securities. Mr. MacMillan also has amounts previously saved under our Canadian Executive Savings Plan (CESP). Our deferred compensation plans for named executive officers are discussed with the compensation tables below underNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

Relocation and Expatriate-Related Expenses.Expenses.    As part of our global mobility program, our policies provide that executive officers and other eligible Associates who relocate at our request are eligible for certain relocation and expatriate benefits to facilitate the transition and international assignment, including moving expenses, allowances for housing and goods and services, and tax assistance. These policies are intended to recognize and compensate Associates for higher costs associated with living and working outside the Associates’ home countries, with the goal that Associates are not financially advantaged or disadvantaged as a result of their international assignment and related taxes. During fiscal 2015,2016, Mr. MacMillan continued his leadership of our European divisionTJX International as Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, after relocating from the U.S. to the U.K. in fiscal 2013 and relocating back to the U.S. in fiscal 2016, and was eligible for expatriate benefits under this program. These expenses are detailed in footnote 5 to5to the Summary Compensation Table.

Perquisites.Perquisites.    We provide limited perquisites and other personal benefits to our named executive officers. These benefits, which are included below as All Other Compensation and detailed in footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table, consist generally of automobile allowances, legal, financial and tax planning services and payment of insurance premiums. None of these perquisites is grossed up for taxes.

> Related Policies and Considerations

Stock Ownership Guidelines.Guidelines.    We have stock ownership guidelines that apply to all of our executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer isand President and our Executive Chairman are expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times annual base compensation. Our President, Chief Financial Officer and each Senior Executive Vice President are expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value of at least three times annual base compensation. At age 62, the ownership guidelines are reduced by fifty percent. These guidelines are designed to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and to encourage a long-term focus. As of April 11, 2016, each of our executive officers was in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines and policies. Our policies also prohibit our executive officers from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to TJX stock. As of April 14, 2015, each of our executive officers was in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines and policies.

Employment Agreements.Agreements.    The ECC has reviewed and approved, after consultation with its independent compensation consultant, individual employment agreements for our named executive officers that set their terms of employment, including compensation, benefits and termination and change of control provisions discussed below underSeverance and Change of Control Provisions. We believe that these employment agreements help retain our executives and support our succession planning process. process, including our CEO transition at the start of fiscal 2017.

The ECC takes the terms of these agreements into account when approving compensation for our named executive officers, including the performance-based stock awardawards granted to Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz in connection with her entering into a new employment agreement during fiscal 2015.

our CEO transition, described above.

In January 2014, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. MacMillan, which became effective at the beginning of fiscal 2015 and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, continues until January 28, 2017. In January 2015, we entered into new employment agreements, effective at the beginning of fiscal 2016, with Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Goldenberg and Mr. Sherr. The agreements replace the existing two-year agreement with Ms. Meyrowitz replaced her prior two-year agreement and was scheduled to continue until January 28, 2017 unless terminated earlier; the existing three-year agreements with Mr. Goldenberg and Mr. Sherr replaced their prior three-year agreements, and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with their terms, will continue until February 3, 2018.

In October 2015, we entered into new employment agreements with Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz. The new agreements as amended and restated took effect January 28, 201731, 2016 in the case ofconnection with Mr. Herrman’s and Ms. Meyrowitz’s transitions to Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, respectively. The new employment agreement with Mr. Herrman replaced his existing three-year agreement and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, will continue until February 2, 2019. The new employment agreement with Ms. Meyrowitz replaced her existing two-year agreement and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, will continue until February 3, 2018 in the case of Mr. Goldenberg and Mr. Sherr.2, 2019.

The agreements with our named executive officers establish a minimum level of base salary and provide for participation in the SIP (in the case of Ms. Meyrowitz, not in new stock option grants, but in performance-based restricted stock awards, referenced above), MIP and LRPIP, at levels commensurate with the executive’s position and responsibilities and subject to terms established by the ECC, and also entitle the executives to participate in TJX’s fringe benefit and deferred compensation plans. Consistent with her prior agreements,plans, including, in the agreement withcase of Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz, reflects the understanding that she has delegatedan automobile allowance commensurate with their respective positions. Mr. Herrman’s and is expected to continue to delegate certain day-to-day responsibilities while retaining responsibility for all executive functions associated with her duties and responsibilities as CEO of TJX. Ms. Meyrowitz’s agreementagreements also providesprovide for minimum MIP and LRPIP target award levels during the term of the agreements, and Mr. Herrman’s agreement as well as limited perquisitesprovides for enhanced benefits to him under our ESP, including an increased Company match and specifiedthe supplemental performance-based Company credits described above. Ms. Meyrowitz’s agreement specifies interest rate assumptions for determining her SERP benefit. Mr. MacMillan’s agreement includes expatriate-related benefits and other provisions related to his assignment with TJX Europe.

Severance and Change of Control Provisions.Provisions.    We provide severance terms to our executive officers, including in connection with a change of control, in our employment agreements and plans. In connection with these terms, eachEach named executive officer has agreed to post-employment non-competition, non-solicitation and other covenants intended to protect our business. We believe that severance and change of control protections assist in attracting and retaining high quality executives and in keeping them focused on their responsibilities during any period in which a change of control may be contemplated or pending and that, more generally, it is important to define the relative obligations of TJX and our named executive officers, including obtaining protection against competition and solicitation. We seek to achieve these objectives in a manner consistent with our shareholder-friendlystockholder-friendly pay practices, taking into account contractual obligations and current market practice, among other considerations. These provisions are described underPotential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.

Double-Trigger Equity Acceleration

During fiscal 2016, the ECC determined that new equity awards granted in September 2015 or later would not include automatic accelerated vesting upon a change of control of TJX. Stock options granted in and after September 2015 will vest upon the change of control if not continued or assumed in the transaction or, if continued or assumed, in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following the change of control. For performance-based stock awards granted after September 2015, including the performance-based stock awards granted to Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman in connection with the CEO transition, performance conditions will be deemed satisfied upon a change of control and the awards will vest upon the change of control if not continued or assumed in the transaction or, if continued or assumed, in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following the change of control.

In addition, the employment agreement with Ms. Meyrowitz that became effective at the start of fiscal 2017 was amended to eliminate severance payable upon a voluntary termination of employment, as described further underPotential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.

Clawback Policy.    We have a clawback policy that, in the event of a material restatement of financial results, allows the Board, based on available remedies, to seek recovery or forfeiture from any executive officer of the portion of incentive compensation that was received by or vested in the executive officer during the three-year period prior to the determination that a restatement was required and that would not have been earned had performance been measured on the basis of the restated results where the Board reasonably determines that the executive engaged in knowing or intentional fraudulent or illegal conduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement.

Annual Compensation Risk Assessment.Assessment.    As discussed inCompensation Program Risk Assessment, above, on page 13, we consider our compensation policies and practices, including our executive officers’ compensation program, as part of our annual enterprise risk assessment process. The ECC considers, among other things, what risks could be created or encouraged by our executive compensation plans and arrangements and how those potential risks are monitored, mitigated and managed. In fiscal 2015,2016, the ECC determined that our overall compensation policies and practices do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX.

Tax and Accounting Considerations.Considerations.    We generally structure incentive compensation arrangements with a view towards qualifying them as performance-based compensation exempt from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m), but we view the availability of a tax deduction as only one relevant consideration. Further, the ECC believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that attracts, retains and rewards the executive talent necessary for our success. Consequently, the ECC authorizes compensation in excess of $1 million that is not exempt from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m).

Compensation Committee Report

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.30, 2016.

Executive Compensation Committee

Alan M. Bennett,ChairChairman

José B. Alvarez

John F. O’Brien

Willow B. Shire

William H. Swanson*

* Mr. Swanson joined the ECC in February 2015.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information concerning compensation for our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our three other most highly paid executive officers during fiscal 20152016 (collectively, our named executive officers):

 

Name and

Principal Position

 

Fiscal

Year

 

Salary(1)

 

Bonus

 

Stock

Awards(2)

  

Option

Awards(2)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compen-

sation(3)

 

Change in

Pension Value

and Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(4)

 

All Other

Compen-

sation(5)

 

Total

 

Carol Meyrowitz(6)

 2015 $1,575,002   $16,485,000   $636,000 $4,582,886 $5,369,489 $  44,014  $  28,692,391  

Chief Executive Officer

 2014   1,475,001   13,898,400     680,528   4,623,832   1,793,231     43,041     22,514,033  
 2013   1,426,924   10,872,000     654,630   6,050,370   2,716,326     48,550     21,768,800  

Ernie Herrman(7)

 2015   1,327,693     7,954,700     530,760   2,968,577    963,397   361,869       14,106,996  

President

 2014   1,260,002     6,158,100     567,934   2,876,223    286,123    356,994       11,505,376  
 2013   1,205,770     7,312,350     546,279   2,999,808    416,056    340,672       12,820,935  

Michael MacMillan(8)

 2015      962,308     2,447,600     287,520   1,352,483    470,719   1,980,244        7,500,874  

SEVP, Group President

 2014      912,310     1,894,800     307,586   1,216,798    225,462  1,968,434        6,525,390  
 2013      886,732     1,594,800     295,961   1,416,231    236,223  3,287,710        7,717,657  

Richard Sherr

 2015      812,309     2,141,650     331,680   1,003,716    514,560    237,658        5,041,573  

SEVP, Group President

 2014      762,308     1,421,100     307,586      926,275    157,923    232,728        3,807,920  
 2013      733,849     1,196,100     295,961   1,099,700    263,712    220,858        3,810,180  

Scott Goldenberg

 2015      663,463     1,835,700     287,520      812,969    371,148    178,764        4,149,564  

SEVP, Chief Financial Officer

 2014      592,310        947,400     236,729      563,098    131,796      84,193        2,555,526  
 2013      560,578        558,180     159,340      612,198    172,147      80,723        2,143,166  

Name and

Principal Position    

 Fiscal
  Year  
   Salary(1)     Bonus   Stock
  Awards(2)  
 Option
  Awards(2)  
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compen-
sation(3)
 Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
 All
Other

Compen-
sation(5)
 Total

Carol Meyrowitz(6)

 2016 $1,575,002  $10,000,030 $631,618 $5,706,608 $1,597,465    $48,974 $19,559,697

Chief Executive

 2015   1,575,002    16,485,000   636,000   4,582,886   5,369,489      44,014   28,692,391

Officer

 2014   1,475,001    13,898,400   680,528   4,623,832   1,793,231      43,041   22,514,033

Ernie Herrman(7)

 2016   1,382,309    14,106,551   527,072   3,614,627      160,103    390,093   20,180,755

President

 2015   1,327,693      7,954,700   530,760   2,968,577      963,397    361,869   14,106,996
  2014   1,260,002      6,158,100   567,934   2,876,223      286,123    356,994   11,505,376

Michael MacMillan(8)

 2016   1,003,847      2,802,000   285,546   1,613,318      185,561 1,182,833     7,073,105

SEVP, Group

 2015      962,308      2,447,600   287,520   1,352,483      470,719 1,980,244     7,500,874

President

 2014      912,310      1,894,800   307,586   1,216,798      225,462 1,968,434     6,525,390

Richard Sherr(9)

 2016      855,540      3,511,600   329,420   1,313,292        90,222    256,620     6,356,694

SEVP, Group

 2015      812,309      2,141,650   331,680   1,003,716      514,560    237,658     5,041,573

President

 2014      762,308      1,421,100   307,586      926,275      157,923    232,728     3,807,920

Scott Goldenberg

 2016      738,463      2,101,500   285,546   1,151,396      131,427    226,875     4,635,207

SEVP, Chief

 2015      663,463      1,835,700   287,520      812,969      371,148    178,764     4,149,564

Financial Officer

 2014      592,310         947,400   236,729      563,098      131,796      84,193     2,555,526
(1)Reflects salary earned during the fiscal year, including any salary adjustments made during the fiscal year. Fiscal 2013 was a 53-week year.

 

(2)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of stock and option awards. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. Option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed in Note IH to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2015.2016.

 

(3)Reflects amounts earned under both MIP and LRPIP. For fiscal 2015,2016, MIP amounts were: Ms. Meyrowitz, $2,826,026;$3,990,740; Mr. Herrman, $1,588,187;$2,334,997; Mr. MacMillan, $474,053;$799,008; Mr. Sherr, $501,756$731,642 and Mr. Goldenberg, $436,499.$686,076. For the fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP cycle, for fiscal 2013-2015, the amounts were: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,756,860;$1,715,868; Mr. Herrman, $1,380,390;$1,279,630; Mr. MacMillan, $878,430;$814,310; Mr. Sherr, $501,960$581,650 and Mr. Goldenberg, $376,470.$465,320. Amounts earned were paid in 2015calendar 2016 following the ECC’s certification of performance results.

 

(4)

Reflects the change in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit obligations under our broad-based retirement plan and our SERP. Under SEC rules, these pension values reflect actuarial assumptions described underPension Benefits, below. For fiscal 2015, the change in our named executive officers’ pension values over fiscal 2014 was primarily driven by lower interest rate assumptions (due to the low interest rate environment at the end of fiscal 2015) and new mortality assumptions (in light of new mortality

tables issued by the Society of Actuaries). In particular, approximately 61% of the fiscal 2015 change in pension value for Ms. Meyrowitz was due to these changes in interest rate and mortality assumptions. Refer toPension Benefits, below, for more information. Our named executive officers did not receive above-market or preferential earnings on non-tax qualified deferred compensation.

 

(5)The table below provides additional details about the amounts listed under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2015.2016. Perquisites and other personal benefits are valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost to the Company.

 

 

Automobile

Benefit

 

Reimbursement

for Financial
Planning and
Legal Services

 

Employer

Contributions or

Credits Under

Savings Plans(a)

 

Company Paid
Amounts for
Life

Insurance(b)

 

Expatriate-
Related
Expenses(c)

 

Tax
Equalization(c)

 

Total

All Other

Compensation

 

Name

   Automobile  
Benefit
   Reimbursement  
for Financial
Planning and
Legal Services
 Employer
Contributions
or Credits
Under Savings
Plans(a)
 Company
Paid
Amounts for
Life
Insurance(b)
 Expatriate-
Related

Expenses(c)
 Tax
Equalization(c)
 Total All
Other
Compensation

Carol Meyrowitz

 $35,904   $3,585   $3,484   $1,041           $44,014   $35,904 $7,133   $4,896 $1,041 - -   $48,974

Ernie Herrman

 35,904   1,500   323,424   1,041           361,869     35,904   3,396 349,752   1,041 - -   390,093

Michael MacMillan

 35,578    –     235,501   1,041   $1,010,739   $697,385   1,980,244     28,468   - 255,281   1,041 $232,096 $665,947 1,182,833

Richard Sherr

 35,904   1,500   199,213   1,041           237,658     35,904   1,500 218,175   1,041 - -   256,620

Scott Goldenberg

 35,904   1,500   140,319   1,041           178,764     35,904   1,500 188,430   1,041 - -   226,875

 (a)Reflects matching contributions under our 401(k) plan, as well as forin the case of Mr. Herrman, Mr. MacMillan, Mr. Sherr and Mr. Goldenberg, matching credits under our ESP.

 

 (b)Reflects company-paid amounts under our management life insurance program or, for Mr. Herrman, payment in lieu of participation in that program.

 

 (c)Reflects expenses pursuant to our global mobility program in connection with Mr. MacMillan’s assignment with TJX Europe, during fiscal 2015 afterincluding his relocation fromreturn to the U.S. tofrom the U.K. during fiscal 2013.2016. Amounts listed underExpatriate-Related Expenses include a U.K. housing allowance, ($395,858), a goods and services allowance, and administrative and living expenses, moving expenses and a repatriation allowance, as well as tax reimbursement in connection with such benefits ($497,663)103,627). Mr. MacMillan was also eligible for expatriate coverage under our medical plans, but was not eligible for payments for any loss on the sale of his home.plans. Amounts listed under Tax Equalization reflect estimated net amounts payable under our tax equalization policy arising from additional taxes payable in respect of Mr. MacMillan’s compensation as a result of his relocation to the U.K. and prior relocation from Canada.international assignments. The policies in our global mobility program are designed to enable us to relocate talent where needed throughout our global business.

 

(6)Ms. Meyrowitz served as Chief Executive Officer during fiscal 2016 and, as of the beginning of fiscal 2017, serves as Executive Chairman of the Board. Ms. Meyrowitz’s stock awards and total compensation reported above include the grant date value of the following awards: for fiscal 2016, 140,371 shares of a performance-based stock award granted in connection with our CEO transition as described on pages 31-32 of theCompensation Discussion and Analysis; for fiscal 2015, 250,000 shares of a fiscal 2016 MIP-based stock award; and for fiscal 2014, 240,000 shares of a fiscal 2015MIP-based stock award, including the value of accrued dividends from the date the ECC awarded the shares to the grant date for accounting purposes; and for fiscal 2013, 240,000 shares of a fiscal 2014 MIP-based stock award. These stock awards contained service and performance conditions for the related fiscal year and were intended by the ECC as compensation for that fiscal year.purposes. Under SEC rules, these stock award values are reported in the Summary Compensation Table by grant date as determined for accounting purposes.purposes, even if the awards contained service and performance conditions related to a different fiscal year. Refer to the CEO Pay for Performance chart on page 1720 ofCompensation Discussion and Analysis, above, to see the grant date value of stock awards attributed to the fiscal year of the respective service and performance conditions.

 

(7)Mr. Herrman served as President during fiscal 2016 and, as of the beginning of fiscal 2017, also serves as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Herrman’s stock awards and total compensation reported above include the grant date value of the following awards: for fiscal 2016, 130,000 shares of a fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP-based stock award plus a performance-based restricted stock unit (career shares) award of 70,186 shares granted in connection with our CEO transition as described on pages 31-32 of theCompensation Discussion and Analysis; for fiscal 2015, 130,000 shares of a fiscal 2015-2017 LRPIP-based stock award; and for fiscal 2014, 130,000 shares of a fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP-based stock award; for fiscal 2013, 130,000 shares of a fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP-based stock award, plus a fiscal 2013 MIP-based stock award and a fiscal 2014 MIP-based stock award of 25,000 shares each.award.

 

(8)Amounts received by Mr. MacMillan that were paid in U.K. pounds sterling were converted to U.S. Dollarsdollars at the average annual exchange rate of $1.5225 per pound for fiscal 2016; $1.6364 per pound for fiscal 2015; and $1.5693 per pound for fiscal 2014; and $1.5888 per pound for fiscal 2013.2014. Amounts received by Mr. MacMillan that were paid in Canadian dollars were converted to U.S. Dollarsdollars at the average annual exchange rate of $0.9628 per Canadian dollar for fiscal 2014.

(9)Mr. Sherr’s stock award and total compensation for fiscal 2016 includes the value of accrued dividends with respect to a fiscal 2017 MIP-based stock award from the date the ECC awarded the shares to the grant date for accounting purposes.

Our named executive officers were entitled under their employment agreements to participate in our SIP, MIP and LRPIP and received cash incentives and equity incentives only pursuant to these plans during fiscal 2015.2016. Ms. Meyrowitz’s agreement providesin effect during fiscal 2016, and the new employment agreements that became effective at the start of fiscal 2017 with Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman as described on page 34 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, provide for target award opportunities during the term of the agreement of at least 150% of hertheir respective base salary for MIP and at least 100% of hertheir respective base salary for LRPIP, payment of reasonable fees of her legal and financial advisors incurred in negotiating her agreementtheir agreements and an automobile allowance commensurate with her position. In connection with entering into hertheir positions. The new employment agreement, on January 30, 2015agreements with Ms. Meyrowitz received 250,000 shares ofand Mr. Herrman also provide for performance-based restricted stock with service and performance conditions relating toawards during fiscal 2016. Mr. MacMillan’s agreement provides2016 for specified vacation/holiday benefits and benefits under our global mobility policieseach executive in connection with his assignment with TJX Europe.our CEO transition and, starting in fiscal 2017, annual performance-based stock awards for Ms. Meyrowitz during the term of the agreement, as described on pages 31-32 of the Compensation Discussion and

Analysis. Mr. MacMillan also remains entitled to benefits in connection with his prior relocation to the U.S. from TJX Canada, including service credit for vesting purposes, supplemental amounts under our ESP, and applicable tax equalization benefits.

In fiscal 2015, all of our named executive officers participated in our alternative SERP benefit except Ms. Meyrowitz, who participated in our primary SERP benefit. All of our named executive officers participated in our tax-qualified defined benefit plan and were eligible to make deferrals to our 401(k) plan and our ESP. All of our named executive officers except Ms. Meyrowitz received matching credits under the ESP and participated in our alternative SERP benefit during fiscal 2015.2016. Ms. Meyrowitz participated in our primary SERP benefit. Our named executive officers were also entitled to receive an automobile benefit and to participate in fringe benefit plans and programs made available to executives generally.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 20152016

The following table reports potential payouts under our cash incentive plans and all other stock and option awards that were granted during fiscal 20152016 to our named executive officers:

 

Name and

Award Type

 

Grant

Date

 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards($)(1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(#)
  

All
Other

Stock

Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

 

All Other

Option

Awards:
Number  of
Securities
Under-
lying
Options(#)

  

Exercise or

Base Price

of Option

Awards($)(2)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards($)(3)

 
  

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

     

  Carol Meyrowitz

                

MIP(4)

       $2,362,503   $4,725,006             

LRPIP(5)

        1,575,000    3,150,000             

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             53,000   $59.70   $636,000  

Stock Awards(6)

 1/30/2015                    250,000                  16,485,000  

  Ernie Herrman

                

MIP(4)

        1,327,693    2,655,387             

LRPIP(5)

        1,100,000    2,200,000             

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             44,230    59.70    530,760  

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014                    130,000                  7,954,700  

  Michael MacMillan

                

MIP(4)

        529,270    1,058,539             

LRPIP(5)

        700,000    1,400,000             

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             23,960    59.70    287,520  

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014                    40,000                  2,447,600  

  Richard Sherr

                

MIP(4)

        446,770    893,539             

LRPIP(5)

        500,000    1,000,000             

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             27,640    59.70    331,680  

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014                    35,000                  2,141,650  

  Scott Goldenberg

                

MIP(4)

        364,905    729,810             

LRPIP(5)

        500,000    1,000,000             

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             23,960    59.70    287,520  

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014                    30,000                  1,835,700  

Name and Award Type

 Grant
Date
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards($)(1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(#)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Under-
lying
Options(#)
  Exercise or
Base Price of
Option
Awards($)(2)
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards($)(3)
 

 

 

 

  Threshold Target  Maximum  Threshold Target  Maximum 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Carol Meyrowitz

                 

MIP(4)

   - $2,362,503   $4,725,006             

LRPIP(5)

   -  1,575,000    3,150,000             

Stock Options

  9/17/15              43,620   $72.54    $631,618  

Stock Awards(6)

  1/29/16             -  140,371   -            10,000,030  

Ernie Herrman

                 

MIP(4)

   -  1,382,309    2,764,618             

LRPIP(5)

   -  1,100,000    2,200,000             

Stock Options

  9/17/15              36,400    72.54    527,072  

Stock Awards(6)

  3/31/15       -  130,000   -        9,106,500  
   1/29/16             -  70,186   -            5,000,051  

Michael MacMillan

                 

MIP(4)

   -  552,116    1,104,232             

LRPIP(5)

   -  700,000    1,400,000             

Stock Options

  9/17/15              19,720    72.54    285,546  

Stock Awards(6)

  3/31/15             -  40,000   -            2,802,000  

Richard Sherr

                 

MIP(4)

   -  470,547    941,094             

LRPIP(5)

   -  500,000    1,000,000             

Stock Options

  9/17/15              22,750    72.54    329,420  

Stock Awards(6)

  3/31/15       -  40,000   -        2,802,000  
   3/31/15       -  5,000   -        350,250  
   1/29/16             -  5,000   -            359,350  

Scott Goldenberg

                 

MIP(4)

   -  406,155    812,309             

LRPIP(5)

   -  500,000    1,000,000             

Stock Options

  9/17/15              19,720    72.54    285,546  

Stock Awards(6)

  3/31/15             -  30,000   -            2,101,500  
(1)Non-Equity Incentive Plan amounts above reflect short-term cash incentives granted under our MIP and long-term cash incentives granted under our LRPIP. Our MIP and LRPIP are discussed above inCompensation Discussion and Analysis.

 

(2)All option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price on the NYSE on the date of grant.

 

(3)

Reflects the aggregate fair market value of stock and option awards on the grant date. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. Option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes

option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed in Note IH to our consolidated financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2015.2016.

 

(4)Reflects award opportunities under the fiscal 20152016 MIP. Actual amounts earned under the fiscal 20152016 MIP awards are disclosed inCompensation Discussion and Analysis and footnote 3 to the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(5)Reflects award opportunities under the fiscal 2015-20172016-2018 LRPIP cycle.

 

(6)Reflects performance-based restricted stock awards granted under the SIP or, for Mr. MacMillan, a performance-based deferred stock award granted under the SIP, plus, for Mr. Herrman, a performance-based restricted stock unit (career shares) award granted under the SIP. Mr. Sherr’s stock award with a grant date of January 29, 2016 in this table includes as part of the grant date fair value the value of accrued dividends from the date the ECC awarded the shares in March 2015 to the grant date for accounting purposes.

In fiscal 2015,2016, we granted all equity incentives, including stock options and performance-based stock awards, under our SIP. Stock options have a maximum term of ten years from the grant date and generally vest in equal annual installments over three years upon a change of control and in the event of certain terminations of employment. In the event a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, or retirement at or after age 65 with five or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for up to five years following termination, unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. Following a retirement at or after age 65 with ten or more years of service, or a retirement at or after age 60 with twenty or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for five years following termination and unvested options continue to vest for the three-year period following retirement on the same basis as if the named executive officer had not retired and generally remain exercisable for five years following retirement, unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. In the event of any other termination, other than a termination for cause, vested options for our named executive officers generally remain exercisable for up to six months following termination (as specified under the terms of the option), unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. All options, whether or not then vested, are forfeited on a termination for cause.

The performance-based stock awards have both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, except that Ms. Meyrowitz’s awards fully vest upon a change of control and, for Ms. Meyrowitz, in the event of her death or disability.disability termination and all stock awards made before September 2015 fully vest upon a change of control. For performance-based stock awardedawards granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2015,2016, the service-based conditions are satisfied by continuous employment through the scheduled vestinga specified date or in the event of certain terminations of employment (as described below) and the performance-based conditions are tied to the corporate performance target under our MIP or LRPIP, as described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis, with full vesting subject to achievement of a payout of at least 67% of the target payout under the applicable plan. If the payout is less than 67% for the performance period, a prorated portion of the unvested award will be forfeited. If no payout is achieved for the performance period, the entire unvested award will be forfeited. When a participant’s performance-based stock award vests, the participant is entitled to any dividends (or dividend equivalents) for the restricted period.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20152016 Year End

The following table provides information on outstanding option and stock awards held as of January 31, 201530, 2016 by our named executive officers:

 

 Option Awards  Stock Awards 
 Option Awards    Stock Awards  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
          Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
 
Name 

Number of

Securities
Underlying
Unexercised

Options
Exercisable(#)(1)

  

Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options

Unexercisable(#)(1)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned

Options

 

Option
Exercise

Price ($)

  Option
Expiration
Date
    Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(#)(3)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested($)(2)(3)
  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards:
  Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
Exercisable(#)(1)
 Number of Securities
Underling
Unexercised Options
Unexercisable(#)(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
 Option
Exercise
Price($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested(#)(3)
 Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested($)(2)(3)
 Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested(#)(3)
 Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)(2)(3)
 
 

Number of

Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(#)(3)

 Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested($)(2)(3)
 
   

Carol Meyrowitz

Carol Meyrowitz

  

          
 11,383   0  $18.870  9/17/19    11,383          0  $18.87   9/17/19      
 116,546   0   20.565  9/09/20  116,546          0  20.565   9/09/20      
 108,320   0   26.555  9/07/21  108,320          0  26.555   9/07/21      
 42,454   21,226   45.170  9/20/22    63,680          0  45.17   9/20/22      
 18,595   37,186   56.720  9/19/23    37,188 18,593  56.72   9/19/23      
 0   53,000   59.700  9/10/24    17,667 35,333  59.70   9/10/24      
  240,000  $15,825,600   250,000  $16,485,000              0 43,620  72.54   9/17/25      
               250,000   $17,810,000   140,371   $10,000,030  

Ernie Herrman

Ernie Herrman

  

          
 91,560   0   20.565  9/09/20    25,000          0  20.565   9/09/20      
 90,380   0   26.555  9/07/21    90,380          0  26.555   9/07/21      
 35,427   17,713   45.170  9/20/22    53,140          0  45.17   9/20/22      
 15,518   31,034   56.720  9/19/23    31,036 15,516  56.72   9/19/23      
 0   44,230   59.700  9/10/24    14,744 29,486  59.70   9/10/24      
  130,000   8,572,200   260,000   17,144,400              0 36,400  72.54   9/17/25      
               130,000   9,261,200   330,186   23,522,451  

Michael MacMillan

Michael MacMillan

  

          
 16,320   0   26.555  9/07/21      9,596          0  45.17   9/20/22      
 9,597   9,596   45.170  9/20/22    16,808   8,404  56.72   9/19/23      
 8,404   16,808   56.720  9/19/23      7,987 15,973  59.70   9/10/24      
 0   23,960   59.700  9/10/24             0 19,720  72.54   9/17/25      
  40,000   2,637,600   80,000   5,275,200              40,000   2,849,600   80,000   5,699,200  
   

Richard Sherr

Richard Sherr

  

          
 0   9,596   45.170  9/20/22 
 8,404   16,808   56.720  9/19/23             0   8,404  56.72   9/19/23      
 0   27,640   59.700  9/10/24             0 18,426  59.70   9/10/24      
  30,000   1,978,200   65,000   4,286,100              0 22,750  72.54   9/17/25      
               35,000   2,493,400   80,000   5,699,200  

Scott Goldenberg

Scott Goldenberg

  

          
 5,026   0   26.555  9/07/21    15,500          0  45.17   9/20/22      
 10,334   5,166   45.170  9/20/22    12,936   6,468  56.72   9/19/23      
 6,468   12,936   56.720  9/19/23      7,987 15,973  59.70   9/10/24      
 0   23,960   59.700  9/10/24             0 19,720  72.54   9/17/25      
  14,000   923,160   50,000   3,297,000              20,000   1,424,800   60,000   4,274,400  
   
(1)All option awards have a ten-year maximum term of ten years from the grant date and vest in equal annual installments over three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, and upon certain employment terminations. Option awards granted prior to September 2015 vest upon a change of control. Option awards granted in or after September 2015 will vest upon a change of control and certainif the options are not continued or assumed in the transaction or in the event of a qualifying termination of employment terminations.following the change of control.

 

(2)Market values reflect the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 30, 201529, 2016 (the last business day of fiscal 2015)2016), which was $65.94.$71.24.

(3)

The stock awards have both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, except that Ms. Meyrowitz’s awards fully vest upon a change of control and, for Ms. Meyrowitz, in the event of her death or disability.disability termination and awards made before September 2015 fully vest upon a change of control. For performance-based stock awards granted to Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman in connection with the CEO transition, performance conditions are deemed satisfied upon a change of control and the awards will vest upon the change of control if not continued or assumed in the transaction or in the event of a qualifying

termination of employment following the change of control. The following table shows the performance vesting conditions and scheduled vesting dates for our named executive officers’ unvested performance-based stock awards as of January 31, 2015:30, 2016:

 

Name

Number of
Unvested Shares/Units
  

Number of

Unvested SharesPerformance
Conditions(a)

  

Vesting Date(b)

Carol Meyrowitz

Performance
Conditions(a)
250,000Fiscal 2016 MIP (Corporate)3/28/16
    Vesting Date(b)            70,186Fiscal 2017 MIP (Corporate)4/17(c)
     70,185  Fiscal 2017 MIP (Corporate)  

Carol Meyrowitz

240,000Fiscal 2015 MIP (Corporate)2/3/03/15
250,000Fiscal 2016 MIP (Corporate)3/16(c)
18

Ernie Herrman

130,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
  130,000  Fiscal 2013-152015-17 LRPIP4/15/1517
  130,000  Fiscal 2016-18 LRPIP4/15/18
  70,186Fiscal 2017 MIP (Corporate)Prorated annual vesting beginning 2/01/20(d)

Michael MacMillan

  40,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
  130,00040,000  Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/17
     40,000Fiscal 2016-18 LRPIP4/15/18

Richard Sherr

    30,000  

Michael MacMillan

40,000Fiscal 2013-15 LRPIP4/15/15
40,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
  40,00035,000  Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/17
  40,000Fiscal 2016-18 LRPIP4/15/18
    5,000Fiscal 2016 MIP (Corporate)4/15/16
    5,000Fiscal 2017 MIP (Corporate)4/15/17

Scott Goldenberg

  20,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
  30,000Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/17
     

Richard Sherr

30,000  Fiscal 2013-152016-18 LRPIP4/15/15
  30,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
35,000Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/17

Scott Goldenberg

14,000Fiscal 2013-15 LRPIP4/15/15
20,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
30,000Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/17
18
(a)Performance-based vesting conditions will be satisfied if performance under the applicable plan, as certified by the ECC, results in a payoutpayment of at least 67% of the target award payout for the performance period. If the payout is less than 67% for the performance period, a prorated portion of the unvested award will be forfeited. If no payout is achieved for the performance period, the entire unvested award will be forfeited.

 

(b)Each of Ms. Meyrowitz’s performance-based stock awards has service-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied by continued employment through the end of the fiscal year that coincides with or immediately precedingprecedes the vesting date or earlier involuntary termination. Each other performance-based stock award shown above has service-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied by continued employment through the vesting date. StockLRPIP-based stock awards scheduled to vest in April 2016 and April 2017 will also remain outstanding and eligible to vest (prorated, if applicable, based on years completed in the LRPIP cycle) in the event of a termination due to death or disability (and, for Mr. Herrman, involuntary termination) prior to the scheduled vesting date. Mr. Sherr’s MIP-based stock awards will also remain outstanding and eligible to vest in the event of termination due to death or disability after the end of the fiscal year that immediately precedes the vesting date.

 

(c)Expected date of ECC certification of fiscal 20162017 MIP performance results.results, which is typically in March or April.

(d)Mr. Herrman’s performance-based career shares are restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest in full at the end of fiscal 2026 with pro-rated annual vesting beginning at the end of fiscal 2020, subject to his continued employment with the Company.

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested duringDuring Fiscal 20152016

The following table provides information relating to option exercises and performance-based stock award vesting for our named executive officers during fiscal 2015.2016:

 

   Option Awards   Stock Awards 
Name  

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise(#)

  

Value Realized

on Exercise($)(1)

   

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting(#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting($)(2)

 
                   

Carol Meyrowitz

52,123$2,197,545   240,000  $14,769,600  

Ernie Herrman

42,346 1,721,087   135,000   8,193,500  

Michael MacMillan

    30,000   1,834,500  

Richard Sherr

22,017 555,723   20,000   1,223,000  

Scott Goldenberg

    7,000   428,050  

   Option Awards  Stock Awards

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired on

Exercise(#)
  Value Realized
on Exercise($)(1)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on

Vesting(#)
  Value Realized
on Vesting($)(2)

Carol Meyrowitz

  -  -  240,000  $16,446,400

Ernie Herrman

  66,560  $3,264,840  130,000      8,676,200

Michael MacMillan

  25,917       917,034    40,000      2,669,600

Richard Sherr

  35,618       501,301    30,000      2,002,200

Scott Goldenberg

    5,026       209,911    14,000         934,360
(1)Represents the stock price on the NYSE at exercise minus the option exercise price multiplied by the number of shares acquired on exercise.

(2)Represents the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date, calculated as the closing stock price on the NYSE on the vesting date (or the previous business day if vesting occurred on a weekend) multiplied by the number of shares vesting.

Pension Benefits

In the U.S., we have a tax-qualified defined benefit plan, or Retirement Plan, and a nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP. We do not have a policy of granting extra years of credited service for purposes of these plans. Our Retirement Plan was closed to new hires as of February 1, 2006, although participants employed prior to that date continue to accrue benefits. We have not offered primary SERP benefits to any new participants in many years and do not currently intend to do so in the future, although we continue to offer an alternative SERP benefit.

Under our Retirement Plan, participants accrue a benefit payable as an annuity at retirement. Once participation commenceshas commenced after an initial one-year eligibility period, the amount accrued each year, expressed as a life annuity commencing at age 65, is 1% of eligible compensation (base salary and MIP awards) up to a periodically adjusted limit ($116,000120,000 in calendar 20152016 and $111,000$116,000 in calendar 2014)2015) and 1.4% of eligible compensation in excess of that limit. For years of service in excess of 35, the accrual rate is 1% per year of eligible compensation. Compensation for any year in excess of another periodically adjusted limit, currently $265,000, is disregarded for these purposes. Eligible participants are also entitled to supplemental credits. Benefits under the Retirement Plan generally vest after five years of vesting service. A vested participant who retires or whose employment terminates prior to age 65 with at least ten years of vesting service may elect to receive a reduced annuity benefit commencing at age 55 or later. If the participant dies before commencing his or her benefit, a pre-retirement death benefit is payable to the participant’s surviving spouse.

Under our SERP, the primary benefit provides participants who retire at or after age 55 with at least ten years of service a benefit equal to the value of an annuity commencing at age 65 providing annual payments up to a maximum of 50% of the participant’s final average earnings, less other employer-provided retirement benefits and social security benefits. Ms. Meyrowitz is the only one of our named executive officers eligible for a SERP primary benefit and has accrued the full benefit except for any increases related to final average earnings. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Meyrowitz is entitled to specified interest rate averaging assumptions if more favorable than her primary benefit under existing SERP terms. In determining final average earnings, the primary SERP includes base salary and MIP, but not LRPIP, and uses the highest average of five years over the preceding ten years. The alternative SERP benefit provides participants whose Retirement Plan benefits are affected by Internal Revenue Code benefit restrictions with the amount of the benefits lost by reason of those restrictions. Participants who are eligible for the primary benefit are eligible to receive the alternative benefit in lieu of the primary benefit if it provides a greater benefit at the time of retirement or other termination of employment. Benefits under SERP are payable following retirement or other termination of employment in installments or in certain other forms of actuarially equivalent value, including a lump sum. If the participant dies prior to retirement or other termination of employment, a pre-retirement death benefit is payable to the participant’s surviving spouse.

Pension Benefits for Fiscal 20152016

The following table provides information on pension benefits for our named executive officers eligible for these benefits as of January 31, 2015.30, 2016. All of our named executive officers are fully vested in their Retirement Plan and SERP benefits.

 

Name                  Plan Name                   Number of Years of
Credited Service(1)
  

Present

Value of

        Accumulated        

Benefit(2)

   

Payments

    Made During    

Last Fiscal

Year

  

Plan Name

  Number of
Years of
Credited
Service(1)
  Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(2)
  Payments Made
During Last Fiscal
Year

Carol Meyrowitz

  Retirement Plan
SERP (Primary)
  28   $    763,090      Retirement Plan  29     $753,626  -
  20   26,512,949      SERP (Primary)  20  28,119,878  -
            

Ernie Herrman

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
25 520,493    Retirement Plan  26      492,290  -
25 2,406,099  
              SERP (Alternative)  26    2,594,405  -

Michael MacMillan

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
10 237,345    Retirement Plan  11       250,927  -
10 1,134,491    SERP (Alternative)  11    1,306,470  -
            

Richard Sherr

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
22 585,889    Retirement Plan  23       570,133  -
22 1,200,108  
              SERP (Alternative)  23    1,306,086  -

Scott Goldenberg

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
22 614,351    Retirement Plan  23       614,875  -
22 729,001    SERP (Alternative)  23       859,904  -
            
(1)Participants in our Retirement Plan and our alternative SERP benefit program began to accrue credited service upon participation in the plans, generally after one year of service with TJX. Participants underService credited for purposes of our primary SERP benefit began to accrue creditedis based on years of service immediately and are eligible to be creditedwith TJX but with a maximum of 20 years of service.

 

(2)Under SEC rules, for purposes of calculating the present value of the accumulated pension benefits in the Pension Benefits table we assumed that each named executive officer commences his or her benefit at age 65 (or current age, if older than 65) and we used the same assumptions used and described in Note JI to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2015,2016, including a post-retirement mortality assumption based on the sex distinct RP-2014 Tables projected generationally with Scale BB-2D from 2006. For our SERP, consistent with the assumptions used to determine the values in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016, the present value of accumulated benefits assumes payment forms consistent with executive elections and has been converted to the forms using an interest rate of 3.1% for the primary SERP benefit and 3.7% for the alternative SERP benefit. Actual amounts payable to our named executive officers under our Retirement Plan and SERP would be determined based on the governing terms (including actuarial assumptions and form and timing of benefit payments) specified in our plans and agreements, which are not the same as, and could produce benefit values higher than those produced by, the assumptions used for purposes of the values reported in the Pension Benefits table or Summary Compensation Table.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

We have an Executive Savings Plan, or ESP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan available to key employees and our directors. Under the ESP, our named executive officers and other eligible Associates can elect to defer up to 20% of base salary and up to 100% of any MIP and LRPIP awards and our directors can elect to defer annual retainers. Our named executive officers (other than Ms. Meyrowitz) were eligible during fiscal 20152016 to receive matching credits on base salary deferrals of up to 10% of base salary, with an enhanced level of matching credits generally based on the executive’s job level, age and/or pension eligibility for a period of up to 15 years. For calendar 2014,2015, the potential match for Senior Executive Vice Presidentsthese executives was 100% of their eligible deferrals, plus, if our MIP performance resulted in a payout of between 90% and 125% of the target corporate award opportunities for fiscal 2015,2016, an additional match ranging from 50% to 150% of their eligible deferrals. Our named executive officers (other than Ms. Meyrowitz) earned this additional performance-based match at 139.24%150% based on fiscal 2015 corporate MIP results. For a portion of fiscal 2015, Mr. Goldenberg earned an ESP match at the Executive Vice President level equal to 20% of his eligible deferrals plus an additional performance-based match of 45.70% of his eligible deferrals based on fiscal 20152016 corporate MIP results. Matching employer credits are 50%100% vested after five years of plan participation and are 100% vested after ten years of plan participation, at age 55, or upon a change of control or separation from service by reason of death or disability. Eligible participants are also entitled to supplemental employer credits. As of January 31, 2015,30, 2016, all named executive officers with ESP employer credits were fully vested. Starting in fiscal 2017, under his new employment agreement, Mr. Herrman will be eligible for increased matching credits and supplemental performance-based employer credits discussed above inCompensation Discussion and Analysis. All amounts

deferred or credited to a participant’s account under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments available onselected by the market.participant. Although not required by the ESP, it has been our practice to purchase the investments notionally invested under the participants’ accounts to help meet our future obligations under the ESP.

Under the ESP, amounts deferred (and earnings on those amounts) are generally distributed following termination of employment unless the participant has elected an earlier distribution date, which may be no earlier than January 1st of the second year following the year of the deferral. Vested employer matching credits (and earnings on those amounts) are generally distributed at, or on a deferred basis following, a participant’s separation from service. Distributions are generally made in a lump sum payment, but a participant may elect to be paid in annual installments over a period of not more than ten years. Amounts vested under the ESP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) can be distributed at the participant’s request prior to termination of employment in a lump sum distribution of 85% of the vested account, with the remaining 15% forfeited.

In connection with his prior service with TJX Canada, Mr. MacMillan participated in the Canadian Executive Savings Plan, or CESP, a deferred compensation plan for eligible employees of TJX Canada. Under the CESP, participants can contribute a portion of their base earnings to a trust fund maintained in Canada and receive notional matching employer credits, including a performance-based match based on TJX Canada MIP results. CESP contributions are invested, and matching credits are notionally invested, in mutual funds or other market investments available onselected by the market.participant. Mr. MacMillan holds amounts previously deferred under the CESP but was not eligible to make new contributions or receive matching credits under the CESP during fiscal 2015.2016. Mr. MacMillan has a current right to his participant contributions to the CESP (and earnings on those amounts) and a right to employer matching credits (and earnings on those amounts) upon termination of employment. Distributions of matching credits are generally made in a lump sum or up to ten annual installments.

Through December 31, 2007, we offered eligible key employees and directors the opportunity to participate in the General Deferred Compensation Plan, or GDCP, another U.S. nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Ms. Meyrowitz is a vested participant in this plan. Under the GDCP, participants could defer all or a portion of base salary and MIP and LRPIP awards and,or, in the case of directors, retainers and meeting fees, which deferrals are credited with notional interest at an annually adjusted rate based on an average yield of Treasury securities during the prior year. For calendar 2014,2015, this rate was 2.36%2.48%. No further deferrals were permitted beginning with fiscal 2009 compensation, but previously deferred amounts continue to be credited with notional interest amounts.

Amounts deferred under the GDCP on or after January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) that had not been distributed prior to January 1, 2009 are distributed under the terms of the ESP, as described above. Amounts deferred under the GDCP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts credited prior to that date)amounts) are distributed in a lump sum during employment as elected by the participant, or, for participants whose employment terminates at or after age 55, in a lump sum or in installments upon or following termination of service or upon an event or at a date (no later thanas elected by the participant (with all payments completed by the tenth anniversary of termination of service) and in a lump sum or in monthly installments as elected by the participant.. Upon a change of control, each participant receives the entire amount credited to his deferred account in a lump sum payment.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 20152016

The following table provides information on fiscal 20152016 nonqualified deferred compensation plans for our named executive officers:

 

Name and

Plan Name

  Executive
Contributions
  in Last FY(1)  
   Registrant
Contributions

  in Last FY(2)  
   Aggregate
Earnings in

  Last FY(3)  
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
  Distributions  
   Aggregate Balance at
  Last FYE(4)  
  Executive
    Contributions    

in Last FY(1)
  Registrant
    Contributions    

in Last FY(2)
  Aggregate
    Earnings    

in Last FY(3)
  Aggregate
    Withdrawals/    

Distributions
      Aggregate Balance    
at Last FYE(4)

Carol Meyrowitz

                   

GDCP

   –             –             $  14,269         –         $   617,381   -  -   $14,751  -   $632,132

ESP

   $315,000     –                   159,580     –                 2,777,345   $315,000  -  (160,072)  -  2,932,273
     

Ernie Herrman

         

ESP

       132,770   $319,940   128,978   –       2,918,991     138,231  $344,856      7,396  -  3,409,474
     

Michael MacMillan

             

ESP

 96,231   232,017   208,569   –       2,235,975     100,385    250,385  (257,146)  -  2,329,599

CESP(5)

 –           –           39,702   $697   365,061   -  -    (17,751)  -     296,425
     

Richard Sherr

         

ESP

 121,846   195,729   166,706   –       2,884,737     128,331    213,279  (164,101)  -  3,062,246
     

Scott Goldenberg

             

ESP

 66,346   136,835   132,967   –       1,884,379      73,846    183,534  (194,442)  -  1,947,317
     
(1)Reflects notional credits to participant accounts. Amounts are also included as Salary or Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation, as applicable, in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)Reflects notional credits to participant accounts. Amounts include the performance-based matching credits earned under the ESP for fiscal 2015.2016. The amounts in this column are also included in All Other Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(3)Reflects notional market-based earnings on deferrals and other amounts credited to the account of plan participants under the ESP, notional interest under the GDCP as described above, and earnings under the CESP as described above. It has been our practice to purchase the specified notional investments under the ESP to help meet our future obligations under the ESP.

 

(4)The aggregate balance includes deferrals of income for prior fiscal years. Amounts deferred by individuals who were named executive officers for the fiscal year of the deferral were included in the compensation reported for those individuals in the compensation tables in prior proxy statements. The aggregate balance also includes earnings on amounts deferred and performance-based matching credits earned under the ESP for fiscal 20152016 but not credited until after the close of fiscal 2015.2016.

 

(5)CESP amounts for Mr. MacMillan are converted from Canadian dollars at the average annual exchange rate of $0.8982$.7730 per Canadian dollar.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

We believe that providing severance and change of control benefits helps us attract and retain high quality executives and protect our other business interests, as discussed further in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis.

Potential Payments under our Employment Agreements. Each of our named executive officers in fiscal 20152016 was party to an employment agreement providing for payments in connection with the specified termination or change of control events generally described below.

 

  

Termination Other than for Cause or Constructive Termination: If we terminate a named executive officer’s employment other than for cause or the executive terminates employment in connection with a

forced relocation of more than forty miles (a “constructive termination”), the executive would be entitled to twenty-four months (or, for Mr. Goldenberg, fifteen months) of continued base salary and any automobile allowance; cash payments during the same period in an amount sufficient after taxes to

cover the cost of any COBRA continuation of health benefits elected byduring the executive;salary continuation period; cash incentive awards under MIP and LRPIP for each uncompleted year or award cycle, to the extent applicable performance goals are met and adjusted to reflect the executive’s period of service during the year or cycle; and equity awards in accordance with their terms (plus, forterms. In addition, under their respective agreements in effect during fiscal 2016, Ms. Meyrowitz was entitled to acceleration of outstanding and unvested stock options as provided under her agreement). Under his employment agreement,and Mr. Herrman would also bewas entitled to continued vesting of performance-based restrictedLRPIP-based stock awards granted in fiscal 2014 or later to the extent applicable performanceLRPIP goals are met and prorated,adjusted, if applicable, based onto reflect the completed portionexecutive’s period of service during the performance period. Under histheir respective new employment agreement (effectiveagreements that became effective at the beginningstart of fiscal 2016),2017, in addition to the payments and benefits described in the first sentence above, both Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Goldenberg would beHerrman are entitled to twenty-four months (insteadacceleration of fifteen months)stock options and to continued vesting of LRPIP-based stock awards to the extent applicable LRPIP goals are met and adjusted, if applicable, to reflect the executive’s period of service during the performance period (including, for Ms. Meyrowitz, service credit for the year in which termination occurs); salary continuation automobile allowance,for Ms. Meyrowitz will continue to be based on her fiscal 2016 salary rate regardless of when termination occurs; and health coverage-related payments described above.a constructive termination for Ms. Meyrowitz would also include a voluntary termination in connection with an involuntary removal or failure to be nominated or reelected to the Board or as Chairman of the Board.

 

  Death or Disability: Upon a termination of employment by reason of death or disability, each named executive officer (or his or her legal representative) would be entitled to the same benefits as are described above, except that salary continuation would be subject to adjustment for any long-term disability benefits, and the MIP award would be paid at target without proration.proration, any stock option acceleration would be determined under the terms of the applicable award, and, under his new agreement that became effective at the start of fiscal 2017, Mr. Herrman would be eligible for a supplemental credit under the ESP for the year of termination if applicable performance goals are met.

 

  Voluntary Termination: Our named executive officers would not be entitled to these separation benefits upon a voluntary termination (other than a constructive termination), except that if Ms. Meyrowitz had, under her agreement in effect during fiscal 2016, voluntarily terminatesterminated her employment with 90 days’ notice and prior to a change of control, she would behave been entitled to salary continuation, automobile allowance and health coverage-related payments on the same basis as if she had been involuntarily terminated without cause, as well as prorated LRPIP benefits for any full fiscal years in a cycle completed prior to the date of termination.termination to the extent applicable LRPIP goals are met. Under her new agreement that became effective at the start of fiscal 2017, upon retirement or other voluntary termination (other than a constructive termination) Ms. Meyrowitz would not be entitled to any continuation of salary, automobile allowance or health coverage-related payments but would be entitled to benefits under LRPIP and any LRPIP-based stock awards, in each case to the extent applicable LRPIP goals are met and adjusted, if applicable, to reflect the executive’s period of service during the performance period (including, in the case of LRPIP-based stock awards, service credit for the year in which termination occurs).

 

  End of Contract Term: For each of our named executive officers, other than Ms. Meyrowitz, a termination occurring on the last day of the agreement term would be treated as a termination other than for cause unless we make an offer of continued service in a comparable position or, forposition. For Ms. Meyrowitz, such a termination would be treated as a termination other than for cause unless (under her agreement in effect during fiscal 2016) the parties mutually agreeagreed to continue her employment.employment or (under her new agreement that became effective at the start of fiscal 2017) we make an offer of continued service in a comparable position.

 

  

Change of Control: Upon a change of control (with or without a termination of employment), each named executive officer would be entitled to receive a lump sum settlement at target of MIP and LRPIP awards for which the performance period or cycle had not ended, plus any benefits (including any

acceleration of awards) under the SIP and our deferred compensation plans.plans (as described further below). We would also be obligated to pay legal fees and expenses the named executive officer reasonably incurs in seeking enforcement of contractual rights following a change of control.

The events that constitute a change of control under the agreements in effect during fiscal 20152016 generally consist of the following, subject to the qualifications set forth in those agreements: (i) a change of control required to be reported under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; (ii)Act; the acquisition of 20% or more of our common stock followed by a change in a majority of our Board of Directors; (iii) a proxy solicitation or solicitations followed by a change in a majority of our Board of Directors; and (iv) the execution of certain agreements of acquisition, merger or consolidation followed by consummation of the transactions contemplated by such agreement.

 

  Change of Control Followed by Qualifying Termination: Upon a qualifying termination of employment following a change of control, each named executive officer would be entitled to receive alternative severance benefits instead of the separation-related benefits described above. The alternative severance benefits consist of a lump sum severance payment equal to two times the sum of the executive’s annual base salary, any annual automobile allowance and target MIP award amount; and two years of continued participation in medicalhealth and life insurance programs, except to the extent of replacement coverage.coverage; and any benefits (including any acceleration of awards) under the SIP and our deferred compensation plans (as described further below). For this purpose, base salary and the target MIP amount would be determined by reference to the higher of the executive’s base salary immediately prior to termination or the change of control (except that, under her new agreement that became effective at the start of fiscal 2017, base salary for Ms. Meyrowitz would continue to be based on her fiscal 2016 salary rate), and base salary would be adjusted for any long-term disability benefits. Ms. Meyrowitz would also be entitled to a lump sum payment of her vested SERP benefit determined, if more favorable to her, under actuarial assumptions specified in her agreement representing early commencement of her unreduced benefit.

A qualifying termination for these purposes includes a termination by us other than for cause, by the executive for good reason (as defined in the agreements), or a termination by reason of death or disability, in each case within 24 months following a change of control.control without regard to the scheduled term of the agreement. A qualifying termination does not include a voluntary termination without good reason.

In addition to the amounts described above, the executives would remain entitled to vested and accrued, but unpaid, compensation and benefits (including earned but unpaid amounts under MIP and LRPIP) and to any SIP or deferred compensation benefit as described below. We have reserved the right to determine the extent to which Mr. MacMillan would bemay also remain entitled to any compensation and benefits under our global mobility program following completion of his assignment with TJX Europe or a termination of employment for any reason.employment. Our named executive officers would not be entitled to any tax gross-up payment for any “golden parachute” excise tax on change of control benefits, but payments and benefits to each executive would be reduced if and to the extent such a reduction would have put the executive in a better after-tax position.

Potential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards. Under the terms of awards granted under our SIP, upon a termination due to death or disability each of our named executive officers would be entitled to partial vesting of stock options upon a termination due to death or disability (for options granted more than three months prior to the date of termination) and full vesting of both stock options and stock awards upon a change of control.termination; Ms. Meyrowitz would also be entitled to full vesting of unvested stock awards upon terminationawards; and each of employment by reason of death or disability. In the event of a termination without cause or a constructive termination, Ms. Meyrowitz’s options vest in full and her stock awards remain subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance conditions but applicable service-based conditions would be deemed satisfied. Each of the executives,our named executive officers, other than Ms. Meyrowitz, would be entitled to continued vesting of stock awards granted in April 2013 or later upon termination of employment by reason of death or disability (and, for Mr. Herrman, in the event of a termination without cause or a constructive termination), to the extent applicable performance goals are met and prorated, if applicable, based on the completed portion of the performance period. In the event of a termination without cause or a constructive termination, stock options held by Ms. Meyrowitz (and, under his new agreement that became effective in fiscal 2017, Mr. Herrman) would vest in full; Ms. Meyrowitz’s stock awards would remain subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance conditions but applicable service-based conditions would be deemed satisfied; and Mr. Herrman would be entitled to continued vesting of LRPIP-based stock awards, to the extent applicable performance goals are met and prorated, if applicable, based on the completed portion of the

performance period. Following a termination of employment at the end of fiscal 2015,2016, each of the executives would have been able to exercise vested options in accordance with applicable post-termination exercise periods and (upon an eligible retirement)Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Goldenberg, upon retirement at the end of fiscal 2016, would have been eligible for continued vesting of outstanding options, in each case in accordance with the terms described above under the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.

As described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysisand in the following table, new equity awards granted in September 2015 or later do not include automatic accelerated vesting upon a change of control of TJX. Instead, performance conditions for performance-based stock awards will be deemed satisfied upon the change of control, and stock options and performance-based stock awards will vest upon the change of control if not continued or assumed in the transaction or, if continued or assumed, in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following the change of control. A qualifying termination for these purposes includes an involuntary termination without cause or a termination for good reason within 24 months following the change of control. Equity awards granted before September 2015 vest in full upon a change of control of TJX.

The following table sets forth the aggregate estimated value of the acceleration of unvested equity awards held by each of our named executive officers assuming the triggering events occurred on January 31, 2015,30, 2016, all pursuant to the terms of TJX’s plans and each executive’s awards as in effect on such date. These amounts are also included in the potential payment table below.

 

  Triggering Event(1) 
   Death/Disability(2)  Termination without Cause(3)  Change of Control(4) 
Name 

Option

      Awards      

  Stock
      Awards      
  Option
      Awards      
  Stock
      Awards      
  Option
      Awards      
  Stock
      Awards      
 

Carol Meyrowitz

 $266,496   $16,485,000   $1,114,439   $16,485,000   $1,114,439   $16,485,000  

Ernie Herrman

  222,402    8,690,717        8,690,717    930,028    26,131,950  

Michael MacMillan

  120,473    2,674,067            503,789    8,040,600  

Richard Sherr

  123,469    2,116,325            526,752    6,362,775  

Scott Goldenberg

  80,415    1,558,583            376,078    4,279,920  

   Triggering Event(1) 
   Death/Disability(2)   Termination without Cause(3)   Change of Control (4) 

Name

  Option
Awards
   Stock
Awards
   Option
Awards
   Stock
Awards
   Option
Awards
   Stock
Awards
 

Carol Meyrowitz

  $176,837    $10,000,030     $677,713     $10,000,030    $677,713    $10,000,030  

Ernie Herrman

   147,562     18,913,267       -     18,913,267     565,561     33,286,751  

Michael MacMillan

   79,937     5,819,467       -       -     306,355     8,703,600  

Richard Sherr

   85,422     5,205,417       -       -     334,662     8,327,950  

Scott Goldenberg

   69,754     3,633,100       -       -     278,244     5,796,200  
(1)

For purposes of these estimates, we valued performance-based stock awards and stock options using $65.94,$71.24, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 30, 2015,29, 2016, the last business day of the fiscal year. We included the full value of all accelerated performance-based stock awards ($65.9471.24 per share), plus the value of any accumulated dividends that would have been paid upon the vesting of such awards, and the spread value ($65.9471.24 per share minus the option exercise price) for all in-the-money stock options that would have been accelerated upon a termination of employment (including by reason of death or disability) or change of control.the triggering event. We did not include any amounts in respect of stock options that were not in-the-money or outstanding equity awards that were earned based on service and performance as of January 31, 2015,30, 2016 or that would not have accelerated upon the triggering

event. See the Outstanding Equity Awards table on page 40 for more information about these equity awards. We further assumed that each executive would satisfy his or her non-competition, non-solicitation or confidentiality agreements with us following termination.

 

(2)Assumes, for executives other than Ms. Meyrowitz, that the performance conditions applicable to the executives’ unvested stock awards granted in April 2013 or later would have been satisfied.

 

(3)Assumes that the performance conditions applicable to Ms. Meyrowitz’s unvested stock awardawards held by Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman’s unvested stock award granted in April 2013 or laterHerrman would have been satisfied.

 

(4)Assumes that all awards would have beenare cashed out at closing,in connection with the applicable triggering event and that any change of control would have qualified as a “change in control event” under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 409A).Code. Equity awards granted before September 2015 vest in full upon a change of control of TJX. Equity awards granted in September 2015 or later are “double-trigger” awards which do not include automatic accelerated vesting upon a change of control of TJX. Double-trigger awards (including, in this table, performance-based stock awards valued at $10,000,030 for Ms. Meyrowitz and $5,000,051 for Mr. Herrman) would vest in full upon a change of control of TJX if not continued or assumed in the transaction or, if continued or assumed, in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following the change of control.

Potential Acceleration of Unvested Deferred Compensation. As noted above underNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans, any unvested employer credit accounts under the ESP also vest in full upon a change of control or termination of employment due to death or disability.disability, and any accounts under GDCP will be paid upon a change of control.

Related Provisions. Each named executive officer agreed to non-solicitation and non-competition provisions that operate during the term of employment and for twenty-four months thereafter, (or, in the case of Mr. Goldenberg’s non-competition provision, for fifteen months thereafter), and to confidentiality provisions during and after employment. Under his new employment agreement (effective at the beginning of fiscal 2016) Mr. Goldenberg’s non-competition provision operates for twenty-four months (instead of fifteen months) after employment. Benefits under the employment agreements and SERP, as well as benefits attributable to the enhanced employer match forcredits at or above the Senior Executive Vice PresidentsPresident level under the ESP, are also conditioned on compliance with restrictive covenants. Upon a change of control, our named executive officers would no longer be subject to any covenant not to compete following a termination of employment. In accordance with TJX policy regarding expatriate and tax equalization benefits, TJX has the discretion to require repayment by Mr. MacMillan of all or a portion of his assignment-related benefits if he resigns before completion of his assignment with TJX Europe, if his employment is terminated for cause, or if he fails to comply with restrictive covenants.

The agreements and plans include terms designed to comply with the deferred compensation provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 409A), including provisions that would delay certain termination-related benefits for six months beyond termination of employment and alternative payment provisions that could apply in connection with a change of control not described in Section 409A.

The following table sets forth aggregate estimated payment obligations to each of our named executive officers, assuming that the triggering events had occurred on January 31, 2015,30, 2016, all pursuant to the terms of TJX’s plans and each executive’s employment agreement as in effect on such date.

 

Triggering Event and Payments(1)

 C. Meyrowitz  E. Herrman  M. MacMillan  R. Sherr  S. Goldenberg  Carol
Meyrowitz    
 Ernie
Herrman    
 Michael
MacMillan    
 Richard
Sherr
 Scott
Goldenberg 
 

Death/Disability

               

Death/Disability

  

Severance

  $    3,150,000     $   2,680,000     $   1,940,000     $   1,640,000     $   843,750   $3,150,000   $2,780,000   $2,020,000   $1,724,000   $1,500,000  

MIP/LRPIP(2)

   3,870,833     2,440,000     1,233,500     951,000     804,583   3,937,503   2,482,309   1,252,116   970,547   906,155  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(3)

   16,751,496     8,913,119     2,794,540     2,239,794     1,638,998   10,176,867   19,060,828   5,899,403   5,290,839   3,702,854  

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

   110,775     120,069     110,775     120,069     77,352   117,125   127,894   117,125   127,894   117,125  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total(4)

  $    23,833,104     $   14,153,188     $   6,078,815     $   4,950,863     $   3,364,683   17,381,495   24,451,031   9,288,644   8,113,280   6,226,134  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Voluntary Termination with 90 Days’ Notice

               

Voluntary Termination with 90 Days’ Notice

  

Severance

  $    3,150,000     $    —       $    —       $    —       $    —     3,150,000    -    -    -    -  

LRPIP(2)

   1,508,333      —        —        —        —     1,575,000    -    -    -    -  

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

   110,775      —        —        —        —     117,125    -    -    -    -  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $    4,769,108     $    —       $    —       $    —       $    —     4,842,125    -    -    -    -  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

     

Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination

               

Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination

  

Severance

  $    3,150,000     $   2,680,000     $   1,940,000     $   1,640,000     $   843,750   3,150,000   2,780,000   2,020,000   1,724,000   1,500,000  

MIP/LRPIP(2)

   1,508,333     1,100,000     700,000     500,000     433,333   1,575,000   1,100,000   700,000   500,000   500,000  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(3)

   17,599,439     8,690,717      —        —        —     10,677,743   18,913,267    -    -    -  

Health, Life and/or Automobile Benefits

   110,775     120,069     110,775     120,069     77,352   117,125   127,894   117,125   127,894   117,125  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $    22,368,547     $   12,590,786     $   2,750,775     $   2,260,069     $   1,354,435   15,519,868   22,921,161   2,837,125   2,351,894   2,117,125  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Change of Control

                    

Settlement of MIP/LRPIP

  $    3,050,000     $   2,200,000     $   1,400,000     $   1,000,000     $   900,000   3,150,000   2,200,000   1,400,000   1,000,000   1,000,000  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(3)

   17,599,439     27,061,978     8,544,389     6,889,527     4,655,998   677,713   28,852,261   9,009,955   8,662,612   6,074,444  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $    20,649,439     $   29,261,978     $   9,944,389     $   7,889,527     $   5,555,998   3,827,713   31,052,261   10,409,955   9,662,612   7,074,444  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Change of Control followed by Qualifying Termination

               

Change of Control followed by Qualifying Termination

  

Change of Control Benefits (see above)

  $    20,649,439     $   29,261,978     $   9,944,389     $   7,889,527     $   5,555,998   3,827,713   31,052,261   10,409,955   9,662,612   7,074,444  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(3)

 10,000,030   5,000,051    -    -    -  

Severance

   7,875,000     5,360,000     3,007,000     2,542,000     2,092,500   7,875,000   5,560,000   3,131,000   2,672,200   2,325,000  

Deferred Compensation Enhancement(5)

   7,122,271      —        —        —        —     5,459,767    -    -    -    -  

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

   115,584     115,912     115,584     115,912     115,584   122,307   121,980   122,307   121,980   122,307  

Reduction to Maximize After-Tax Benefit(6)

    —        —        —        —       (1,058,184)    -    -    -    -   (1,719,183
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total(4)

  $    35,762,294     $   34,737,890     $   13,066,973     $   10,547,439     $   6,705,898   27,284,817   41,734,292   13,663,262   12,456,792   7,802,568  
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)We used the following assumptions to calculate the payments set forth in the table:

 

We assumed in each case that the termination was not for cause; the executive does not violate his or her non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality or other obligations to us following termination; the executive receives COBRA continuation of medicalhealth coverage for up to 18 months (or, in the case of Mr. Goldenberg, up to 15 months) but does not receive medicalhealth or life insurance coverage from another employer within the relevant periods; and the executive does not incur legal fees requiring reimbursement from us. We also assumed that any change of control would have qualified as a “change in control event” under Section 409A.

For health care benefits, we estimated an amount sufficient after taxes to cover the cost of continuation of medicalhealth coverage based on the COBRA rates in effect as of January 31, 201530, 2016 and assumed, in the case of a qualifying termination following a change of control, that employee contributions for medicalhealth coverage will continue at rates in effect as of January 31, 2015.30, 2016.

 

In the case of payments following termination by reason of disability, the amounts shown assume salary continuation and/or long-term disability payments, coordinated to avoid duplication.

We did not include any amounts in respect of accrued but unpaid base salary or benefits, any amounts in respect of bonuses under MIP and LRPIP for performance periods ending on January 31, 201530, 2016 that were

earned but remained unpaid as of that date or, for Mr. MacMillan, any amounts under our global mobility program. For additional assumptions applicable to equity awards, seePotential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards, above. In addition to the SERP benefitsenhancement described in footnote 5 of this table, our named executive officers were eligible for benefits described above underPension Benefits andNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

 

(2)The amount, for each executive, includes a prorated award for each LRPIP cycle ending after January 31, 2015,30, 2016, based on the portion of the cycle completed as of January 31, 201530, 2016 and assuming target performance, plus, in the event of termination due to death or disability, the fiscal 20152016 MIP award at target without proration. Proration for purposes of the LRPIP amount would have been determined based on the number of completed months ofin the cycle or, in the event of Ms. Meyrowitz’s voluntary termination with 90 days’ notice, the number of completed years in the cycle.

 

(3)Equity awards granted before September 2015 vest in full upon a change of control of TJX and are included in the “Change of Control” scenario in this table. Equity awards granted in September 2015 or later (double-trigger awards) are assumed to be continued or assumed in connection with the change of control and are included in the “Change of Control followed by Qualifying Termination” scenario in this table. SeePotential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards, above for additional detail about these amounts.

 

(4)In the event of death on January 31, 2015,30, 2016, the beneficiaries of our named executive officers would also have been entitled to the following amounts under our management- and executive-level life insurance programs: $520,000 for Mr. Herrman; $1,075,000 for Mr. MacMillan and $975,000 for each other named executive officer. Company-paid amounts for these programs are included and described above in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2015.2016.

 

(5)For Ms. Meyrowitz, the amount represents the estimated value of any enhancement under our SERP in the case of a qualifying termination following a change of control. The enhancement value represents the difference between (a) the estimated amount payable to Ms. Meyrowitz under SERP using the post-change of control actuarial assumptions specified in her employment agreement representing early commencement of her unreduced benefit and (b) the estimated amounts payable to Ms. Meyrowitz under SERP using the pre-change of control actuarial assumptions specified in the plan and her employment agreement (which as of January 31, 201530, 2016 would have produced higher lump sum benefit values than those shown in the Pension Benefits table above by $3,723,138)$4,285,116).

 

(6)In the case of a change of control (both with and without a termination) occurring on January 31, 2015,30, 2016, we estimated the mandatory reductions to benefits that would apply in order to maximize the executive’s benefit after change-of-control excise and other taxes. We determined that no mandatory reduction to benefits would apply in the case of a change of control, without a qualifying termination, occurring on January 31, 2015 and that such reduction would only apply to Mr. Goldenberg’s benefits in the case of a change in control, with an accompanying termination, occurring on January 31, 2015. For purposes of this determination, we assumed that all equity awards would have been cashed out at closing in the amounts described above underPotential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards;Awards; that only a portion of the value of stock options, performance-based stock awards with performance periods ending on January 31, 2015,30, 2016, accumulated cash dividends with respect to such stock awards, and certain other payments, would have been treated as contingent upon a change of control; and that none of the payments would be exempt under a special rule for reasonable compensation or treated as contingent upon a change of control under a special presumption applicable to agreements entered into or amendments made during fiscal 2015.2016. Applying these assumptions, we determined that the only case in which a mandatory reduction to benefits would have been required would have been a reduction to Scott Goldenberg’s benefits in the case of a change in control with a qualifying termination occurring in both cases on January 30, 2016.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

For fiscal 2015,2016, our non-employee directors were entitled to the following payments:

 

Annual retainer of $75,000 for each non-employee director

 

Additional annual retainer of $28,000 for the Audit Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $15,000 for each Audit Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

Additional annual retainer of $26,000 for the Chairman of the subcommittee of the Audit Committee

 

Additional annual retainer of $23,000 for the Executive Compensation Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each Executive Compensation Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

Additional annual retainer of $18,000 for the Corporate Governance Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $8,000 for each Corporate Governance Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

 

Additional annual retainer of $18,000 for the Finance Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $8,000 for each Finance Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

 

Additional annual retainer of $70,000 for the Lead Director

 

Two annual deferred stock awards for each non-employee director, each representing shares of our common stock valued at $70,000$75,000

Employee directors do not receive separate compensation for their service as directors. Members of the Executive Committee do not receive committee-specific compensation. Directors are reimbursed for customary expenses for attending Board and committee meetings. The deferred stock awards (and(including deferred dividends on thosedividend awards) are granted under our SIP. One of the deferred stock awards vests immediately and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock at the earlier of separation from service as a director or change of control. The second award vests based on a director’s continued service until the annual meeting next following the grant of the award (subject to possible earlier vesting upon a change of control), and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock upon vesting or, if an irrevocable advance election is made, at the same time as the first award. In the event that a non-employee director separates from service as a director prior to vesting in the second award, that award will be forfeited.

Our non-employee directors are eligible to defer their retainers and fees under the ESP but are not eligible for matching credits. Amounts deferred by directors under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments. Participating non-employee directors may select a distribution date earlier than retirement from the Board, but no earlier than January 1st of the second year following the year of the deferral. During fiscal 2015,2016, Mr. Bennett and Ms. Shire deferred amounts under the ESP. Prior to January 1, 2008, our non-employee directors were eligible to defer their retainers and fees in our GDCP, under which amounts deferred earn interest at a periodically adjusted market-based rate. Amounts deferred under the GDCP on or after January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) will be distributed under the terms of the ESP, as described above. Amounts deferred under the GDCP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts credited prioramounts) are scheduled to that date) will be paid onupon or after leaving the Board. Mr. Bennett and Ms. Shire currently participate in the GDCP. We do not provide retirement, health or life insurance benefits to our non-employee directors.

The following table provides information concerning compensation for our non-employee directors for fiscal 2015. Compensation for2016. Mr. Cammarata served as Chairman of the Board for a portion of fiscal 2016. While he was Chairman, Mr. Cammarata was also an employee and executive officer of TJX, for fiscal 2015 is included below, although it is our policy that employee directors areother than a named executive officer, who did not paidreceive any additional compensation for their serviceservices provided as directors.a director. Ms. Meyrowitz’s and Mr. Herrman’s compensation isare each shown above in the Summary Compensation Table with that of the other named executive officers.

Directors Compensation for Fiscal 20152016

 

Name

 Fees Earned
or Paid
In Cash
 Stock
Awards(1)(2)
 Option
Awards(2)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 Change in
Pension Value and

Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
 All Other
Compensation
 Total  Fees Earned or
Paid In Cash
   Stock Awards(l)(2)       Total    

Zein Abdalla

 $    83,000   $  143,058             $  226,058   $88,156 $154,517 $242,673

José B. Alvarez

 100,000   160,891             260,891   100,000   177,282   277,282

Alan M. Bennett

 106,000   160,891             266,891   106,000   177,282   283,282

Bernard Cammarata

 500,000(3)        $   306,040(4)  $ 41,929(5)  847,969  

David T. Ching

 98,000   154,268             252,268   124,000   168,171   292,171

Michael F. Hines

 111,000   162,226             273,226   111,000   178,908   289,908

Amy B. Lane

 108,000   159,932             267,932   108,000   175,070   283,070

Dawn Lepore(6)

 29,281   1,712         10,915   41,908  

John F. O’Brien

 155,000   170,625             325,625   148,611   188,095   336,706

Willow B. Shire

 103,000   170,733             273,733   103,000   189,269   292,269

William H. Swanson

   85,000   200,272   285,272

(1)For non-employee directors, reflectsReflects the grant date fair value of annual deferred share awards totaling $140,000 and/or$150,000 (and for Mr. Swanson, prorated deferred share awards granted at his election to the Board of Directors in February 2015) and annual credits of additional deferred shares in the amount of dividends accrued on deferred shares.

 

(2)The following table shows the number of shares subject to outstanding stock awards and option awards for our directors as of January 31, 201530, 2016 (other than Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman, whose outstanding equity awards are shown with the named executive officers above):

 

Name

          Outstanding Stock Awards(a)                  Outstanding Option Awards(b)        

Zein Abdalla

    6,146  

José B. Alvarez

  37,118  

Alan M. Bennett

  37,118  

Bernard Cammarata

    

David T. Ching

  24,722  

Michael F. Hines

  39,330  

Amy B. Lane

  34,109  8,500

Dawn Lepore

    

John F. O’Brien

  51,829  

Willow B. Shire

  53,425  

Name

        Outstanding Stock Awards(a)      

Zein Abdalla

  7,242

José B. Alvarez

38,561

Alan M. Bennett

39,824

David T. Ching

26,026

Michael F. Hines

42,061

Amy B. Lane

35,519

John F. O’Brien

53,437

Willow B. Shire

56,315

William H. Swanson

  2,669
 (a)1,2491,145 deferred shares for each non-employee director were unvested as of the end of fiscal 20152016 and are scheduled to vest on the day before the 20152016 Annual Meeting.

(b)All options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price on the NYSE on the date of grant, have a ten-year term, vest after one year or upon a change of control, and remain exercisable for the lesser of the term of the option or up to five years after cessation of Board service. Upon death within the last year of such five-year period, options remain exercisable for one year following death or until the earlier term of the option. Stock option grants for non-employee directors were eliminated in June 2006.

(3)Represents Mr. Cammarata’s salary under his employment agreement earned in fiscal 2015.

(4)Represents the increase in the actuarial present value of Mr. Cammarata’s accumulated benefit obligations under our Retirement Plan using the same assumptions as used in the Pension Benefits table, above. Non-employee directors do not receive retirement benefits. We do not pay above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation.

(5)Consists of an automobile benefit of $35,904; a matching contribution under our 401(k) plan of $3,484; payment of $1,041 in lieu of participation in our management life insurance program and reimbursement for financial planning of $1,500.

(6)Ms. Lepore did not stand for reelection in June 2014. After her departure from the Board, she served as a consultant to the Company and received consulting fees, reported in the All Other Compensation column.

PROPOSAL 2 -

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AS

TJX’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 30, 2016.28, 2017, subject to ratification by our stockholders. PwC has been retained as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1962. We are asking stockholders to ratify PwC’s appointment. RepresentativesA representative of PwC willis expected to attend the Annual Meeting, where they will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so and will be available to answer questions from the stockholders. The members of the Audit Committee and Board believe that the continued retention of PwC to serve as the Company’s independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2, Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.2.

PROPOSAL 3 -

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

TheCompensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion beginning on page 1619 of this proxy statement describesdescribe our executive compensation program and the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2015,2016, including an overview of our program design and details of the various elements of the program. It also provides details of our fiscal 20152016 performance to provide context for the compensation.

The Board of Directors, as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, is asking stockholders to cast a non-binding, advisory vote indicating their approval of that compensation by voting FOR the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to its named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.

As described in more detail in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis, our compensation philosophy is to create a program that attracts, motivates and rewards our executives while maintaining shareholder-friendly pay practices that help align the interest of our Associates and shareholders.stockholders. We have designed a program that seeks to:

 

attract top talent in the highly competitive retail environment,

 

maintain an extremely high talent level in our company and provide for succession broadly across our management team,

 

reward objective achievement of our short- and long-term financial objectives with plans based on core business goals, and

 

enhance shareholderstockholder value by directly aligning the interests of our Associates and stockholders.

The Board is asking stockholders to support this proposal. We believe TJX’s performance demonstrates the effectiveness of our compensation program. We received a strong supporting vote in the past several years (more than 97%95% of votes cast) expressing support for our compensation policies and practices and believe our program continues to be effective. We continue to focus on pay for performance in our compensation program, as described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis, which we encourage you to review. Although the vote we are asking you to cast is non-binding, the ECC and the Board value the views of our stockholders. As with past years, the Board and ECC will consider the outcome of this vote when determining future compensation

arrangements for our named executive officers. Our Board of Directors currently intends to conduct an annual advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation each year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of our say-on-pay advisory votes is held, which we expect will be no later thanat the annual meeting of stockholders in 2017.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR Proposal 3,3.

AdvisoryPROPOSAL 4 -

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF DIVERSITY AS A CEO

PERFORMANCE MEASURE

We received the following proposal from NorthStar Asset Management, Inc., P.O. Box 301840, Boston, Massachusetts 02130, a beneficial owner of approximately 519 shares of our common stock.

In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the stockholder proposal.

Stockholder Proposal

Executive Compensation & Diversity in Senior Level Management

Whereas:    In an increasingly complex global marketplace, the ability to draw on a wide range of viewpoints, backgrounds, skills, and experience is critical to a company’s success;

The Proponent believes that diversity in senior management helps ensure that different perspectives are brought to bear on issues, while enhancing the likelihood that proposed solutions will be nuanced and comprehensive;

In early 2015, McKinsey Research found that companies in the top quartile for ethnic diversity were 35% more likely to outperform those in the bottom quartile;

Furthermore, research indicates that companies in the MSCI World Index with strong female leadership generated a Return on Equity of 10.1% per year versus 7.4% for those without, as of September 9, 2015;

Shareholders believe that it is crucial for the Company’s senior management to reflect the diversity of its employees and customers. According to Forbes, TJX’s customer profile is a 25 to 44 year old female customer with middle to upper-middle income, while labor force statistics indicate that 49.8% of retail employees are female and 33.1% are minorities;

Unfortunately in the past 5 years, TJX’s senior management team has remained 0% minority and merely 16% female. Of the six executive officers currently comprising senior management, the one female (current CEO Carol Meyrowitz) will leave her position in 2016, leaving the executive offices filled entirely with white men. Given the primarily female customer base, this shift in the executive team is particularly alarming;

A recent article published on theHarvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation indicated that management-level diversity “signals that women’s and minorities’ perspectives are important to the organization, and that the organization is committed to inclusion not only in principle but also in practice. Further, corporations with a commitment to diversity have access to a wider pool of talent and a broader mix of leadership skills than corporations that lack such a commitment”;

McKinsey Research (2015) reinforces the need for diversity in management, noting that “in the United States, there is a linear relationship between racial and ethnic diversity and better financial performance: for every 10 percent increase in racial and ethnic diversity on the senior-executive team, earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) rise 0.8 percent”;

Shareholders are concerned that TJX’s dearth of senior management diversity may be adversely affecting shareholder value and believe that adding diversity in senior level management as a clear metric in our CEO’s compensation package creates an incentive to strive for excellence in this area just as our financial metrics incent performance.

Resolved:    Shareholders request that the Board’s Compensation Committee, when setting CEO compensation, include metrics regarding diversity among senior executives as one of the performance measures for the CEO under the Company’s annual and/or long-term incentive plans. For the purposes of this proposal, “diversity” is defined as gender, racial, and ethnic diversity.

Statement of the Board of Directors in Opposition to Proposal 4

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this Stockholder Proposal.

The Board of Directors opposes this proposal because it believes our independent Board committee, the Executive Compensation Committee, or ECC, is in the best position to evaluate changes to our executive compensation practices.

At TJX, we are committed to our culture, which is honest, integrity-driven, and focused on Associate development. We work to cultivate an inclusive environment, and we value the benefits of leveraging differences. We publish a Corporate Responsibility Report, which speaks, among other things, to our approach regarding diversity and inclusion, and which is available on our website, www.tjx.com, in the Corporate Responsibility section.

We believe that diversity throughout our organization, including within our executive team, is an important component of our success. Our Company was led by Ms. Meyrowitz as Chief Executive Officer from January 2007 until January 2016, and she continues to be an active and integral member of the six person executive team in her current role as Executive Chairman. We have been recognized for our efforts to promote diversity and inclusion, as we discuss in our Corporate Responsibility report, and we have broad non-discrimination policies.

We believe that it is most appropriate for the ECC to continue to determine the CEO’s performance measures that are part of our compensation program. Consistent with best practices of governance, each year, the ECC carefully considers the design, overall level and mix of compensation for our CEO, including the performance metrics and other details of our incentive compensation programs and is advised by an independent compensation consultant. We believe the ECC is in the best position to evaluate changes to our compensation program that will best promote our objectives and align the interests of our Associates and stockholders. We believe that the decisions the ECC has made in recent years, including those more fully described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement, have promoted the best interest of our stockholders through an incentive compensation program that, by using a profit-based metric as the key performance indicator, is objective, transparent and aligned with our core business goals and an overall compensation program that emphasizes pay for performance. For several years, our stockholders have expressed strong support for our executive compensation policies and practices in the annual advisory vote on executive compensation, and we believe our program continues to be effective.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 4.

PROPOSAL 5 -

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR A REVIEW AND SUMMARY REPORT ON

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES

We received the following proposal from the Priests of the Sacred Heart, U.S. Province, 7373 S. Highway 100, P.O. Box 289, Hales Corners, Wisconsin 53130, a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 of our common stock.

In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the stockholder proposal.

Stockholder Proposal

TOP EXECUTIVES’ PAY

WHEREAS, Recent events have increased concerns about the extraordinarily high levels of executive compensation at many U.S. corporations. Concerns about the structure of executive compensation packages have also intensified, with some suggesting compensation systems incentivize excessive risk-taking.

In aForbes article on Wall Street pay, the director of the Program on Corporate Governance at Harvard Law School noted that “compensation policies will prove to be quite costly—excessively costly—to shareholders.” Another study by Glass Lewis & Co. declared that compensation packages for the most highly paid U.S. executives “have been so over-the top that they have skewed the standards for what’s reasonable.” That study also found CEO pay may be high even when performance is mediocre or dismal.

On July 25, 2015,The New York Times featured an extended front-page article entitled: “Pay Gap Widening as Top Workers Reap the Raises.” Later, a September 5, 2015 article in the same paper (“Low-Income Workers See Biggest Drop in Paychecks”) showed the decline in real wages 2009-2014 for the lowest-paid quintile was -5.7% while that of the highest-paid quintile was less than half of that: -2.6%.

A September 2015Harvard Business Review piece noted that a recent global study found that CEO-to-worker pay ratio in most countries is “at least 50 to one,” but “in the United States it’s 354 to one.”

Commenting on “the momentum to rein in runaway pay,” a May 16, 2015 piece inThe New York Times (“For the Highest-Paid C.E.O.s the Party Goes On”) commented: “Dodd-Frank introduced new say-on-pay measures, allowing shareholders to express their discontent. The Securities and Exchange Commission is developing rules that would require companies to reveal the ratio of the chief executive’s pay to that of average workers. And last month, the S.E.C. proposed requiring companies to disclose how performance affects executive pay.”

RESOLVED:    Shareholders request the Board’s Compensation Committee initiate a review of our company’s executive compensation policies and make available, upon request, a summary report of that review by October 1, 2016 (omitting confidential information and processed at a reasonable cost). We request that the report include: 1) A comparison of the total compensation package of senior executives and our employees’ median wage (including benefits) in the United States in July 2006, July 2011 and July, 2016; 2) an analysis of changes in the relative size of the gap and an analysis and rationale justifying this trend; 3) an evaluation of whether our senior executive compensation packages (including, but not limited to, options, benefits, perks, loans and retirement agreements) should be modified to be kept within boundaries, such as that articulated in the Excessive Pay Shareholder Approval Act; and 4) an explanation of Executive Compensation.whether sizable layoffs or the level of pay of our lowest paid workers should result in an adjustment of senior executive pay to more reasonable and justifiable levels and how the Company will monitor this comparison annually in the future.

Statement of the Board of Directors in Opposition to Proposal 5

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this Stockholder Proposal.

The Board of Directors opposes this proposal because it believes the requested review and report would not provide useful additional information to stockholders and would require an unnecessary expenditure of corporate resources that is not in the best interest of our stockholders.

We believe this proxy statement provides more meaningful information for stockholders about the compensation paid to our executives than the analysis and report requested by this proposal. The proxy statement includes a detailed discussion of our compensation objectives and methods, including the process by which compensation decisions are made in the context of our business, which is large, operationally complex and global, with stores in nine countries across three continents and vendors in over 100 countries worldwide.

The ECC, which has responsibility for overseeing our executive compensation program and for approving the compensation of our executive officers, has used the same principles of compensation for many years: establish a program of total compensation competitive with our peers, heavily weighted toward objective, performance-based incentives that focus on execution and reward achievement of our core business goals. The detailed annual disclosures in our proxy statement allow stockholders to assess the reasonableness of TJX’s executive compensation.

Moreover, we provide our stockholders the right to vote, on an advisory basis, on executive compensation at each annual meeting of stockholders. This say-on-pay vote provides our stockholders with the opportunity to provide feedback on our executive compensation practices and disclosure every year. For several years, our stockholders have expressed strong support for our executive compensation practices and disclosure in this say-on-pay vote (more than 95% of votes cast in the past several years), and we believe our program continues to be effective. As in prior years, the ECC will take into account the outcome of this year’s say-on-pay vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

We believe it is imperative that we focus on attracting and retaining the best talent at all levels and in all functions. We want our customers to love shopping our stores and we know our in-store experience is driven by our Associates. In February 2015, we announced a wage initiative that benefits current and future U.S. store Associates. This wage initiative is an important part of our strategy to continue attracting and retaining the best talent to deliver a great shopping experience for our customers, remain competitive on wages in our U.S. markets and remain focused on our value mission.

We believe that the compensation information disclosed in the annual proxy statement and the annual advisory vote on our executive compensation practices and disclosure provide both the information necessary for stockholders to assess whether our compensation practices are appropriate and an appropriate means for stockholders to express approval or disapproval of those practices. As a result, we believe the additional review and report requested by the proposal is unnecessary and an inefficient use of our resources.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 5.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides certain information as of January 31, 201530, 2016 with respect to our equity compensation plans:

 

Plan Category  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights(a)
   Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(b)
  Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column(a)) (c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

   30,586,031    $    34.91   40,393,448  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   N/A        N/A   N/A      
  

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 30,586,031  $    34.91 40,393,448  
  

 

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Plan Category

 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column(a))(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) 29,340,048 $41.68 35,954,546
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A N/A N/A
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 29,340,048 $41.68 35,954,546
 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)We use one equity compensation plan, the Stock Incentive Plan (or SIP), which was most recently approved by shareholdersstockholders in 2013. Securities reported in column (a) include outstanding options as well as outstanding performance-based deferred stock awards and director deferred share awards where the underlying shares have not been issued. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) takes into account option awards but not the 507,802653,841 shares subject to performance-based deferred stock awards and director deferred shareother awards.

For additional information concerning our equity compensation plan see Note IH to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for fiscal 2016.

VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROXIES

The nomineesA nominee receiving a majority of votes properly cast at the meeting (meaning he or she receives more votes cast “for” than cast “against”) will be elected directors.director. As described above inBoard Nominees and Service at TJX, we require any incumbent director standing for election to provide an irrevocable contingent resignation to be considered by the Board if the director receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” such election. You may vote “for” or “against” each of the nominees for director or “abstain” from voting for one or more nominees for director. All other proposals require the approval of the majority of votes properly cast.cast at the meeting (meaning the proposal receives more votes properly cast “for” than cast “against”). You may vote “for” or “against” or “abstain” from voting on one or more of the other proposals.

If you vote your shares by mail, telephone or Internet, your shares will be voted in accordance with your directions. If you vote by mail, telephone or Internet, but do not indicate specific choices as part of that process, your shares will be voted for the election of the director nominees (Proposal 1), for the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2), and for the advisory approval of our executive compensation (Proposal 3) and against each of the shareholder proposals (Proposal 4 and Proposal 5). The persons named as proxies will also be able to vote your shares at postponed or adjourned meetings. If any nominee should become unavailable, your shares will be voted for another nominee selected by the Board or for only the remaining nominees. However, brokers are not permitted to vote your shares on any matter other than the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered

public accounting firm (Proposal 2) without instruction from you. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee and you do not instruct the broker or nominee on how to vote your shares with respect to the election of the director nominees (Proposal 1) or, the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3) or the shareholder proposals for inclusion of diversity as a CEO performance measure and for a review and summary report on executive compensation policies (Proposal 4 and Proposal 5, respectively), or if you abstain or withhold authority to votefrom voting on any matter, your shares will not be counted as having been voted on that matter and will therefore have no effect on the outcome of the vote, but will be counted as in attendance at the meeting for purposes of a quorum.

If you are voting plan shares, you must provide your voting instructions by the deadline described above in theIntroduction so that the plan trustee may vote your plan shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not timely provide your voting instructions, your plan shares will not be voted.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

A stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and who wishes the proposal to be included in our proxy materials for that meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must submit the proposal in writing to us so that we receive it no later than December 26, 2015. 30, 2016.

A stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders but does not wish the proposal to be included in our proxy materials for that meeting must provide written notice of the proposal to us no earlier than February 12, 20167, 2017 and no later than March 13, 2016.9, 2017. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements. Our by-laws, which are available on our website, www.tjx.com, describe the requirements for submitting proposals at the Annual Meeting.

A stockholder who wishes to nominate a director at the 20162017 Annual Meeting must notify us in writing no earlier than February 12, 20167, 2017 and no later than March 13, 2016.9, 2017. The notice must be given in the manner and must include the information and representations required by our by-laws.

OTHER MATTERS

At the time of mailing of this proxy, we do not know of any other matter that may come before the Annual Meeting and do not intend to present any other matter. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournment, the persons named as proxies will have discretionary authority to vote the shares represented by the proxies in accordance with their own judgment, including the authority to vote to adjourn the meeting.

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. We have retained Morrow & Co., LLC to assist in soliciting proxies by mail, telephone and personal interview for a fee of $11,500, plus expenses. Our officers and other Associates may also assist in soliciting proxies in those manners.

DIRECTIONS TO THE TJX ANNUAL MEETING

TJX CORPORATE HEADQUARTERSFour Seasons Hotel Denver

770 Cochituate Road1111 14th Street

Framingham, MA 01701Denver, CO 80202

From Denver International Airport

Exit 13the Airport and go North on Pena Boulevard
Merge onto I-70 West via the exit lane on the Massachusetts Turnpikeleft
Take I-25 South, Exit 274, toward Colorado Springs
Take the Speer Boulevard Exit (Exit 212B)
Make a left onto Lawrence Street
Make a right onto 14th Street and enter the main drive of the Four Seasons Hotel Denver on the left-hand side

From the North

After

Travel I-25 South
Take Speer Boulevard Exit (Exit 212B)
Make a left onto Lawrence Street
Make a right onto 14th Street and enter the main drive of the Four Seasons Hotel Denver on the left-hand side

From the tollbooth, bear left onSouth

Travel I-25 North
Take the exit ramp across an overpass andtoward Broadway (Exit 207A)
Merge onto Route 30 / Cochituate Road. AtLincoln Street
Make a left onto Speer Boulevard
Make a right onto Lawrence Street
Make a right into 14th Street and enter the main drive of the Four Seasons Denver on the left-hand side

From the second set of lights, turnEast

Travel I-70 West
Take I-25 South, Exit 274 toward Colorado Springs
Take the Speer Boulevard Exit (Exit 212B)
Make a left into The TJX Companies, Inc. facility.

From Logan International Airport (From the East)

Leaving the Airport, follow the signs for the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W). Follow the Massachusetts Turnpike West for approximately 20 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFrom Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

onto Lawrence Street
Make a right onto 14th Street and enter the main drive of the Four Seasons Hotel Denver on the left-hand side

From the West

Travel I-70 East
Take Massachusetts Turnpike East (I-90E) to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFromI-25 South, Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

From the North

Take I-95 South to exit 25 (Massachusetts Turnpike I-90). 274 toward Colorado Springs

Take the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W) approximately 6.5 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFromSpeer Boulevard Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

From the South

Take I-95 North to exit 25 (Massachusetts Turnpike). Take the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W) approximately 6.5 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFrom Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

(Exit 212B)
Make a left onto Lawrence Street
Make a right onto 14th Street and enter the main drive of the Four Seasons Hotel Denver on the left-hand side

Parking

TJX offers free parking. Follow

Valet parking is available at the parking lot directory signage to the visitor parking areas.Four Seasons Hotel Denver

Room Location

Building Entrance

Enter the building through the Northeast Entrance (facing the Massachusetts Turnpike (I-90)).

Aspen Room

        LOGO

LOGO

 LOGO
 

 

Electronic Voting Instructions

 

 

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

 

 

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

 

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

 

 

Proxies for record holders submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., EasternMountain Daylight Time, on June 11, 2015.7, 2016. See reverse for more information.

 

    LOGO

  

 

Vote by Internet

• Go towww.envisionreports.com/TJX

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

 
   
   
 

 

Vote by telephone

 

  

•  Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

 

•  Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. x 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN BELOW, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.   q

 

  A   Proposals —The Board recommends a voteFOR each of the nominees andFOR Proposals 2 and 3.Voting Items

 The Board recommends a voteFOR each of the nominees andFOR Proposals 2 and 3.

+
1.  Election of Directors: For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain  +

 

     01 - Zein Abdalla

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 02 - José B. Alvarez ¨ ¨ ¨ 03 - Alan M. Bennett ¨ ¨ ¨  
     04 - David T. Ching ¨ ¨ ¨ 05 - Michael F. HinesErnie Herrman ¨ ¨ ¨ 06 - Amy B. LaneMichael F. Hines ¨ ¨ ¨  
     07 - Carol MeyrowitzAmy B. Lane ¨ ¨ ¨ 08 - John F. O’BrienCarol Meyrowitz ¨ ¨ ¨ 09 - Willow B. ShireJohn F. O’Brien ¨ ¨ ¨  
     10 - William H. SwansonWillow B. Shire ¨ ¨ ¨          

 

   For  Against  Abstain       For  Against  Abstain

2. Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016.2017.

  ¨  ¨  ¨   

3. Say-on-Pay: Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation.

  ¨  ¨  ¨

 

The Board recommends a voteAGAINST Proposals 4 and 5.

  B  Non-Voting Items

Change of Address — Please print new address below.

    Comments— Please print your comments below.
   ForAgainstAbstain  ForAgainstAbstain

4. Stockholder proposal for inclusion of diversity as a CEO performance measure.

¨¨¨

5. Stockholder proposal for a review and summary report on executive compensation policies.

¨¨¨

 

  CB   Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on the books of the Company. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title to indicate the capacity in which you are signing.

 

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

 

 

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

 

 

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

    /        /                

LOGO

¢    1 U P X+

02CEAD


The TJX Companies, Inc.

20152016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Thursday,Tuesday, June 11, 2015,7, 2016, 9:00 a.m. EasternMountain Daylight Time

TJX Corporate Headquarters

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

Four Seasons Hotel Denver

1111 14th Street

Denver, Colorado 80202

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet at:www.envisionreports.com/TJX

Your vote is important. Please vote by internet,Internet, by telephone or by mail.

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

 

Proxy — THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

+

LOGO

Proxy — THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

20152016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting - June 11, 20157, 2016

Carol Meyrowitz,Ernie Herrman, Scott Goldenberg and Mary B. Reynolds,Ann McCauley, or any of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized as Proxies to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned with respect to all of the matters indicated on the reverse side of this card and any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. to be held at TJX Corporate Headquarters, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusettsthe Four Seasons Hotel Denver, 1111 14th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 on Thursday,Tuesday, June 11, 20157, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. (local time)(Mountain Daylight Time), or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the Proxies subject to the directions indicated by the stockholder on the reverse side of this card. If no directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR each nominee, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.3 and AGAINST Proposals 4 and 5. In their discretion, the Proxies are hereby authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

However, if you are voting shares held in the TJX stock fund available through The TJX Companies, Inc. General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan, our U.S. 401(k) plan, or The TJX Companies, Inc. General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (P.R.), our Puerto Rico savings plan, (collectively, “plan shares”), your plan shares will be voted by the plan trustee in accordance with your instructions. Your voting instructions must be received by11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, Sunday,Thursday, June 7, 20152, 2016to allow time for tabulation and voting.Please note that if your instructions are not received by this time, your plan shares will not be voted.

(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)

 C 

Non-Voting Items

Change of Address— Please print new address below.Comments— Please print your comments below.

¡+